2016 POST ELECTION STRATEGY AND TACTICS – PART 4

New York City Statue of Liberty (from here)
New York City Statue of Liberty (from here)

What posts have gone before?

  • PART 1: We spoke of my personal goal for good government. Is it the same goal you might have? Perhaps.
  • PART 2: We considered the primary obstacle to good government.
  • PART 3: We reviewed the defensive components of a strategy for good government.

PART 4 reviews the offensive components of a strategy for good government. Whereas PART 3 focused primarily upon the individual citizen’s refusal to take part in harmful activities, PART 4 focuses on joint action.  Because our government has the form of a representative democracy, we must work together to keep it under control.

The Components Of A Strategy For Good Government: The Offensive Components

As we lay out the offensive components of a strategy for good government, please keep this in mind. In a free society, the individual citizen makes choices for him or her self. In a free society, government officials have limited power.  Government officials can only do what the law permits them to do. Citizens, however, can do anything that the law does not restrict them from doing. In a free society, the law restricts us from infringing upon the rights of others.  In a free society, government enforces laws which discourage us from infringing upon each others rights. In addition, government arbitrates our differences so that we can exercise our rights with minimal disruption to each others lives.

On the other hand, in a totalitarian society, the reverse is true. Government officials are only restrained by the edicts of those officials above them, and citizens can only do what the government permits them to do. In a totalitarian society, the law — to the extent it exists — is only for show. Hence, to have a free society, our laws must actually limit the power of government officials.

Exercise Control Of The Executive Branch

In the last election, the Republican Party won the presidency.  So President-Elect Donald Trump is now in the process of nominating his cabinet. Fortunately, many of people Trump wants to appoint are Constitutional Conservatives.  Most of the others at least appear competent.  Hence, we must pressure the senators representing our state to approve Trump’s nominations (especially the Conservatives).

Restore the Constitution

What is the primary means rogue government officials have used to escape constitution restraints? They nominate and appoint judges who are willing to say the Constitution says what they want it to say.  Trump has promised to appoint judges who are Constitutional Conservatives. We must work to hold him to that promise, and we must work on our senators to approve the appointment of genuine Constitutional Conservatives.

One Person, One Vote

The Democratic Party is notorious for subverting the election process. Instead of clean and honest elections, what Democrats want is a system that makes it as EASY as possible to vote.  An honest election is clearly more important than making it easy to vote.  If someone is not willing to register to vote, come to the polls, present a photo ID, and then vote, why should the rest of us care if they vote? They obviously don’t care.

To reform the system, Conservatives should pressure Republicans to use their majorities in both the House and Senate and their control of the presidency to at least fix the obvious. Ensure every state and locality:

  • Cleans up its voter rolls. Only American citizens should be allowed to vote, and no one should be voting in more than one locality.
  • Puts into place a system that ensures only properly registered voters can vote.
  • Verifies each registered voter only votes once.

We need to keep the obvious in mind. If the vote is not honest, what good does it do to make certain that minorities can vote?

Does it make any sense to just assume that an election will be honest? Don’t Democrats want us believe the Russians would steal an election for Trump? Then why would Democrats want us to believe that Democrats, Republicans or a third-party would not steal one for themselves?

Send Illegal Aliens Back To Their Own Country

The presence of millions of illegal aliens in this country clearly shows just how willing Democrats are to cheat and steal an election. Because they expect the folks from the war-torn areas in the Middle East to vote for them, Democrats are eager to bring these people into our country. They are even willing to ignore the fact that some of these people are terrorists.

Some, of course, will say that those folks from those war-torn areas in the Middle East are just refugees, that it does not make any sense to compare them to illegal aliens. That ignores the fact that Democrats would love to classify all the illegal aliens entering this nation as refugees of some sort. They want them to vote, even if they vote illegally. If our politicians respected the law and were willing to do their jobs, we would not have millions of illegal aliens in this country. It does not serve the national interest, but it does serves their personal interests.

If we want to preserve our language, culture, and system of government, we have to get immigration back under control. Instead of putting them on welfare, we must insist that the people who immigrate to our country love America and want to become Americans.

Rebuild Our Communities

After the American Revolution, the thirteen colonies needed a national government to perform functions the United Kingdom had provided for, primarily national defense and the regulation of interstate commerce.  Hence, the framers wrote our Constitution, a document that gave the Federal Government a few specific powers. These are enumerated in Article 1, Section 8.

When the thirteen colonies adopted our Constitution, America had a few large cities, but most of the population lived in small communities.  They saw government primarily as a local activity, and they saw state government as a referee between local governments. Non-profit associations (especially churches) and local local government assisted parents in the education of children and took responsibility for charity. Because of their good works, non-profit associations and local governments provided the means for everyone to find their niche in society. Because of churches and local governments, the majority of people felt they had a place where they belonged, where they could contribute back to the community that sheltered them something of value.

Consider this proverb.

Proverbs 22:6 New King James Version (NKJV)

Train up a child in the way he should go,
And when he is old he will not depart from it.

For a different perspective, here is another translation.

Proverbs 22:6 Good News Translation (GNT)

Teach children how they should live, and they will remember it all their life.

That proverb is not just talking about educating a child in the Bible. It is about helping someone find their calling.

What has God called each of us to do in this life? Government has no way to resolve that question for us.  What government officials do is keep us from hurting each other. People with such powers may be good at bossing us around, but being bossed around will not help us find our calling. To find our way — to find out what God has called us to do — we need the help of our family, friends, and neighbors; not politicians. We need the help of the people in our churches and our local communities.

Unfortunately, instead of exercising self-restraint, state officials and Federal politicians have contrived to set up a welfare state. For the sake of money and power, they they have weaken our churches and disrupted local communities with innumerable health, education, and welfare programs. If you don’t know your neighbors well, that’s one reason why.

To Be Continued

What will Part 4 be about? What Specifically Can We Do?

 

WHERE DO THE “GREAT” BUSYBODIES COME FROM? — AN UPDATE

A painting by Andre Castaigne depicting the phalanx attacking the centre during the Battle of the Hydaspes. (from here)
A painting by Andre Castaigne depicting the phalanx attacking the centre during the Battle of the Hydaspes. The Indians had 200 war elephants. (from here)

UPDATE:  This is a related post => The Word became flesh.

When I was a boy, history fascinated me. So I read biographies about “great” people.  One man I still remember reading about is Alexander the Great. Why was he great? As a conqueror, he had no equal.

Read about Alexander, and you will discover a man who had no fear of unequal contests. With far fewer soldiers (see here and here), for example, Alexander defeated the Achaemenid Empire (Persia), led by Darius III.

Unfortunately, Alexander accomplished little good. When it comes right down to it, Alexander the Great was just a great busybody.

What finally stopped Alexander’s string of bloody conquests? Alexander’s soldiers grew tired marching farther from home, fighting farther from home, and dying farther from home. Alexander’s soldiers grew tired being pawns in Alexander’s grand scheme to conquer the whole world (see Revolt of the army).

Today we still have “great” busybodies with grand schemes that promise great things. Here are a few random examples and reasons why we must revolt against the schemes of busybodies.

Our National Infrastructure

In his opinion piece, The national infrastructure dilemma, John Sitilides observes why Donald Trump’s $1 trillion national infrastructure program may fail.

Here’s the bottom line: Even if President Trump successfully persuades Congress to immediately pass a $1 trillion infrastructure bill, he will be frustrated by the reality that the first project wouldn’t begin, and the first job wouldn’t be created, until 2021. The real first step to a national infrastructure and job-creation solution is requiring all environmental impact statements be completed in a 12-month “one-stop” permitting process. Only then will the Trump infrastructure plan have a chance to succeed in making America great again.

To put it short and sweet, government busybodies, unconcerned about wasting other people’s money, require too much red tape, but even Sitilides fix won’t fix the basic problem.  What happens when we give our money to politicians? Do they ever figure out exactly what we need and provide it to us? Doesn’t that work about as well as stopping at the entrance of a Walmart, giving the greeter 50 dollars, and asking greeter to go inside and bring you what you need?

Why wouldn’t giving our money to the greeter work better? At least you could give that greeter a list, but what is Donald Trump going to do with 300 million lists? How much can we trust that greeter? How much can we trust Donald Trump? How much can we trust Congress?

The Public School System

In Shakin’ Up the Little Red Schoolhouse, Suzanne Fields observes that our public schools keep getting worst.  To underscore the degree of neglect she cites an old report.

The concern is not new. A loud alarm was sounded in 1983 with a report entitled “A Nation at Risk,” and Ronald Reagan held it up at a press conference, decrying the substandard performances of school children across America. The report concluded: “If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war. As it stands, we have allowed this to happen to ourselves.”

Think about Fields’ reference to the little red schoolhouse. American education began as a local enterprise. Neighbors who knew each other pooled their resources so they could hire a teacher to instruct their children. Now? Now we have four levels of government (school board, local government, state government, and Federal) sticking their noses into the education of our children. Politicians take our money and hire a grand bureaucracy, thereby rewarding teachers unions for their campaign donations.  Then, to add insult to injury they indoctrinate our children with politically correct courses and tout expensive school buildings (or classrooms in “temporary” buildings) as an improvement over the little red schoolhouse.

Is there a better alternative? What do the rich do? Don’t they send their children to private schools? Don’t we “invest” enough money in the public school system to do the same for everyone’s children? When the alternative is politicians who will reward special interests, what is wrong with parents deciding who educates children?

Political Favoritism At Our Nation’s Museum

In Clarence Thomas snubbed by Smithsonian’s new African American history museum, Washington Times reporter Bradford Richardson tells us about the blatant bias at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History.

Of the 112 justices appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court since its inception, only two have been black — and the second one apparently isn’t worth consideration, as far as the new National Museum of African American History and Culture is concerned.

The Smithsonian museum still has “no plans” to include in its exhibitions a reference to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, one of the high court’s conservative stalwarts who celebrates his 25th anniversary on the bench this year. (continued here)

I hardly think I am the only American who finds the whole idea of an African American Museum hypocritical. Don’t we all know how people would react to a White American Museum, even one funded by a private group? Yet here we have a Federally funded museum that overtly discriminates based upon race, and that’s not the story, not even in the Conservative Washington Times. Nope! The problem is that the museum is discriminating against a Conservative African American.

🙄

How stupid do we have to be to put up with this nonsense? What kind of moron thinks we can trust politicians to run a museum and not engage in political propaganda or worse? The museum is racist. Given that, what is the point in demanding that Clarence Thomas be included in the museum’s exhibition? That racist farce needs to be shut down.

Conclusion

From time to time I refer to an old post, BUSYBODYISM. When I wrote that post, I labelled the Democratic Party as the party of Busybodyism.  That’s not to say that members of the Republican Party are never busybodies. The point is that for Democrats being busybodies is ideological. Just as Alexander offered rape, pillage, and the glories of conquest to induce his soldiers to march to India, our modern political busybodies dream up schemes for spending “other people’s money”.

The government of the United States exists to preserve our freedom, not to run our lives for us. When we can do something ourselves, there is no reason to tax our neighbors and make them pay for it.  If something can be done by the local government, there is no reason for the state government to do it. If something can be done by the state government, then the Federal Government, particularly when the Constitution does not give it the authority, has no reason to get involved.

Still, there is more to Busybodyism than people sticking their noses where they don’t belong. Government busybodies don’t just stick their noses where they don’t belong; they wrest control from us. They take our money and spend it for us. They make our choices for us.  If we want to get what we want, roads where we need them, schools that work, or museums that respect the truth, then we have to make our own choices and pay for the services we use. That means tolls and user fees to pay for a decent transportation infrastructure. That means we pay for the education of our own children or at least insist upon education vouchers. That means private museums funded by the people who visit them. That means a limited government where we give busybodies the boot.

WINNING THE PEACE — A POST FOR VETERANS DAY

soldierI served in the military.  I proudly wore the uniform of the United States Air Force for many years, but I have a hard time considering myself a veteran. I served in the United States. I never saw a combat zone. The roughest duty I had was in Alaska, separated from my family, and my wife knew Alaska was my idea of a vacation spot. Even at 30-40 below zero, I enjoyed the peace and exhilaration that comes from quietly slipping down a snowy forest trail on cross-country skis.  So when I left my lady with our two little children, she could not muster any sympathy, and I did not have the nerve to ask for any.

A veteran is someone who has risked their life in the service of a great cause. A veteran is someone who has suffered for the cause.  Because war is violent and bloody, we fear it. We fear it because even the survivors come back changed by the harshness of war.

What is war? I don’t really understand it. Does anyone? My father saw combat in WWII. For him, it was unspeakable. As curious as I was, I could hardly pry anything out of him. Even though he continued to serve for decades and retired from the military, he said almost nothing about his combat experiences. Therefore, I still wonder. What did I owe him for his sacrifice? What can I do for the people who risked so much for my family, friends, neighbors, countrymen, and even for me?

Winning the peace is harder than winning the war.
Xavier Becerra (from here)

We can strive to win the peace.

When I went looking for the quote above, I was dumbfounded to find it supposedly belongs to a relatively obscure California congressman. I think the observation has to go back further than that. Nevertheless, each generation must rediscover the problem for itself.

During the Cold War, JFK put it this way.

The world has not escaped from the darkness. The long shadows of conflict and crisis envelop us still. But we meet today in an atmosphere of rising hope, and at a moment of comparative calm. My presence here today is not a sign of crisis, but of confidence. I am not here to report on a new threat to the peace or new signs of war. I have come to salute the United Nations and to show the support of the American people for your daily deliberations. For the value of this body’s work is not dependent on the existence of emergencies–nor can the winning of peace consist only of dramatic victories. Peace is a daily, a weekly, a monthly process, gradually changing opinions, slowly eroding old barriers, quietly building new structures. And however undramatic the pursuit of peace, that pursuit must go on. — John F. Kennedy (from here)

We cannot completely win the peace. Until the Second Coming, we will not know peace. Still, for the sake of our family, friends, neighbors, countrymen we must strive for peace, but what does that striving mean in practice?

Consider again how JFK defined peace.

Peace is a daily, a weekly, a monthly process, gradually changing opinions, slowly eroding old barriers, quietly building new structures. And however undramatic the pursuit of peace, that pursuit must go on.

When we are at peace with each other, we have found a way to live together without resorting to violence. That involves compromises, and it is difficult to work out and maintain those compromises. During the Civil War, for example, no compromise could be found. Therefore, by the end of that war, the combatants had filled our graveyards with the bodies of the fallen. The survivors became veterans.

To win the peace — to maintain the peace — requires hard work and sacrifice from each of us. We cannot rightfully sit back as an observer — enjoy the fireworks — and turn the work of building peace over to someone else. We must participate in gradually changing opinions, slowly eroding old barriers, and quietly building new structures.

Consider a couple of disparate examples.

  • Donald Trump is now president. During the transition, he will begin the process of appointing his cabinet and many other government officials.  Because personnel equates to policy, we will learn from his appointments just how serious he is about his campaign promises. Contact the man any way you can. Make yourself heard in letters to the editor and in emails and phone calls to your Senators and Congressmen. Explain how you expect our elected leaders to help us — WE THE PEOPLE — make America Great Again.
  • There is a move afoot to recall Prince William County’s School Board Chairman, Mr. Ryan Sawyers. The following news article describes the effort: Committee Petitions to Recall School Board Chairman. If we agree with the petition drive and live in Prince William County, then we should make some effort to support it.

As citizens, we must carefully select, help, and monitor our elected officials. Sometimes we even have to insist that they find something else to do with their time. That is how Americans win peace among themselves and with the citizens of other nations. Striving to win and keep the peace is how we show our respect for our veterans.

When we take part in the development and execution of public policy, we can work to avoid sending good men and women to war. Because we respect the sacrifices required by war, we must strive to avoid asking anyone to make such sacrifices. However, when the only option is warfare, we must continue working for peace. Then we must do our best to support our military forces and see to it we celebrate their sacrifices on Veterans Day, not Memorial Day.

ESTABLISHING A TRAJECTORY INTO ETERNITY

voteSince I am into politics, I get emails from the local Republican politicians and Donald Trump’s campaign. They are all screaming vote at the top of their lungs, and they each giving different reasons. Their reason are generally about the here and now, not the hereafter.

After we die, what difference does it make? Remember how Hillary Clinton asked that question.

Of course, H. Clinton wanted to get as far away from that video that she and President Obama used to explain the terrorist attack. And yet there were funerals.

So is this sort of lying why we should not vote for H. Clinton, that we should vote for Donald Trump instead? No.

Why does government exist? Why do each of us exist? We all have our own beliefs, but most of us believe that after this life somehow we will continue on into eternity. Therefore, when we vote we should be considering how our vote helps us and those we love prepare for eternity.

To prepare for eternity, what kind of government do we need? What does our Lord in heaven think about government? The Bible comes at that subject basically from two different directions (Here is a good reference for finding various verses). As this article points out, What does the Bible say about government?, we are to be obedient to the governing authorities, but obedience to God comes first. As 1 Samuel 8, illustrates quite clearly, we also have some responsibility for the type of government we choose to live under. We never want to idolize our government. We always want to put our Lord in Heaven at the forefront of our existence.

We the People empower our leaders. That’s why we get the leadership we deserve. When we choose the wrong kind of leaders, we allow the wrong kind of leaders to help us establish our trajectory into eternity.

If we want the kind of leadership that will help us, our families, our friends, our neighbors, and our countrymen reach heaven in glory, then we need to choose modest and honest men and women to lead us. Big government programs won’t get us to heaven. Absurdly rosy promises from politicians won’t get anyone into heaven. What will get us into heaven is reading and studying our Bibles and practicing what it teaches. Therefore, what need from our government is a government that protects our right to live a good Christian life. What we need from our government is leadership that does not get in the way and block us when we try obey our Lord’s command to spread His Gospel.

Matthew 28:18-20 New King James Version (NKJV)

18 And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.

The reason we should not vote for Hillary Clinton is that we cannot count upon her to defend our right to freedom of religion.

As the last article indicates, who we elect to be our president will not solve the problem of religious freedom. If we want to be a free people, we each have to be committed to protecting the God-given rights of our family, friends, neighbors, and countrymen. We also have to pray. Jesus is our Shepherd. Without His help, we are lost.

Nevertheless, Jesus acts through us. We are His hands and feet. So make certain you pray and do your best to vote wisely.