cares of the worldFrankly, my blogging has taken a more religious turn. Why? Of course, I am fed up with the Liberals and RINOs, but mostly I just don’t know what else to do. With my hand in their hand, I watch my country as a small child might watch a drunken parent stumbling towards a cliff. I know neither my father or my mother should do that, but with my one small voice how can I make anyone listen? So I have turned to God, and He does listen.

Because God left us here to serve, we cannot withdraw from this world. Even if it is not enough, we must give it our best. So what is going on? Well, here is something bloggers should care about.

 So-Called Net Neutrality

Because the topic is currently in the news, if we google internet regulation we will get plenty of hits. What is the problem with that?

The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday adopted sweeping new regulations sought by President Obama for how Americans use and do business on the Internet, in a party-line vote that is sure to be challenged by the broadband industry.

The commission, following a contentious meeting, voted 3-2 to adopt its so-called net neutrality plan — a proposal that remained secret in the run-up to the final vote.

On its surface, the plan is aimed at barring service providers from creating paid “fast lanes” on the Internet, which consumer advocates and Internet companies worry would edge out cash-strapped startups and smaller Internet-based businesses. Chairman Tom Wheeler said it would ensure an “open, unfettered network.”

But the rules, more broadly, would put the Internet in the same regulatory camp as the telephone by classifying it like a public utility, meaning providers like Comcast or Verizon would have to act in the “public interest” when providing a mobile connection to your home or phone. (continued here)

When I was growing up, I discovered the news was interesting. Then I discovered the big three networks all said much the same thing. They did not compete based upon the quality of the news they presented. They competed based upon how well they presented the same news. Because the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulated their ability to broadcast over the air, the FCC had control of their licences. That’s one reason the news media is largely Liberal.

How did I come to understand this? By accident.  When cable TV and the Internet came along, I was too amazed to complain about the lost of objectivity in the news media. Instead, what the FCC’s lost of control demonstrated to me is that that objectivity had always been a phony charade.

Here are some other views.

Why Don’t The American People Understand What They Are Losing?

Why don’t the American people understand what they are losing? I don’t know. That is the reason I started the ANSWERING FOLLY series. Yet even after the series is over I probably won’t be able to answer my question. At best, I will just know more about how to avoid being a fool.

Even though our leaders and the educated among us know what such a thing is, we continue to creep step-by-step towards a police state. Our leaders and the educated among us have read about, seen pictures of, and heard from the victims of police states. So why are these people leading us towards that cliff? What makes them behave as if they were drunk?

Those who have been once intoxicated with power, and have derived any kind of emolument from it, even though but for one year, never can willingly abandon it. They may be distressed in the midst of all their power; but they will never look to anything but power for their relief. — Edmund Burke (Letter to a Member of the National Assembly (1791).) (from here)

On a lighter note and just for fun => Happy Caturday (


freedomconscienceIn my last post, I mentioned a couple of debates.  One continues here, Biblical Truths, with siriusbizinus. Here is ‘s latest comment.

Essentially my assertions that God doesn’t exist is a conclusion. I have stated this openly in the discussion. And although I cannot disprove God, no one can sufficiently prove God either through objective, non-testimonial, falsifiable evidence. Simply because I cannot conclusively disprove God does not make my position untenable. All it means is that people can reach different conclusions.

Furthermore, I actually have studied the Bible, and the claims that I discount are mostly unfalsifiable. That some of the claims have proven true do not reach the question of whether or not there is divine anything in the universe. I addressed that specifically in the post above.

Third, I am a former Christian. I have studied the Bible, and I am quite familiar with the claims it makes. The points I raise do not come from a lack of understanding. Because I have studied it, new evidence will be required to warrant giving it different weight. If you have it, I shall be more than willing to consider it.

And finally, the Bible serving as the foundation of our culture’s morality is a statement that needs evidence in order to be debated. In short: you will need evidence to back up that assertion. (from here)

Here is my reply.

There is a word that is much abused: pragmatism. We Americans often take pride our pragmatism. Because we do what works, we think ourselves pragmatic, and therefore, effective and efficient. Yet we do everything we do — everybody does everything they do — based upon limited knowledge. Because we don’t know enough to prove anything beyond the question of a doubt, we do everything we do just because it works. Or do we?

That’s point of an assumption, believing some things because they are self-evident. Should we examine our assumptions? Yes? Yet at some point we must believe some things, have faith in some truths, just because we know they are true.

If we do not want to believe, no one can prove anything to us. Without the faith to believe what we know to be true, we cannot prove we exist, that we are born, that we breath, that we die, and that we go back to the dust and ashes from which we came.

So how can we believe God exists? We must have faith that the evidence of our senses and the longing in our hearts mean something, that the universe did not create itself, that we exist for a reason.

How can we believe God does not exist? We can declare in “faith” everything pointless and random, that it has been so for all eternity. That I exists for me. We can discard our concern for eternity as meaningless babble. That now is the moment that matters.

You say you were a Christian, that you have studied the Bible. At best, as Colorstorm observed (here), we have only begun.

You say I must provide evidence that the Bible serves as the foundation of our culture’s morality. In recent years, that connection to the Bible has become weaker. Unlike the early generations of those who settled this nation and past generations of Europeans, we glory in secular wisdom. We do not do our best to make certain our young men and women learn Biblical wisdom, eternal wisdom. But how could I quantify the difference that makes? With statistics? When you refuse to believe that God exists, how I can show you the difference a belief in Jesus Christ makes in the heart of a human being?

In an earlier time, Europeans did not argue about the existence of God. They argued about the meaning of the birth, life, and the death of Jesus Christ. When Adam Smith wrote The Theory of Moral Sentiments, he accepted as given the fact he wrote to other Christians.

Did such a widespread belief in Jesus Christ make a difference? Have you listened to the music of 3 Bs? Have you read the Declaration of Independence? Have you ever compared what Christians believe with what people believed before the birth of Christ? Do you understand why Christians promoted scientific progress? They believed that God is not the author of confusion, that His creation is orderly.

Have you considered the irony? You speak of your rights. Yet in past ages most men were slaves. Don’t you know why? Perhaps you would just explain it away with a word, “progress.” Can you define progress? Without God, when me and now are all there is, how can we define progress in any meaningful way? (from here)

POSTS WORTH READING — September 27, 2014


From time-to-time we must catch up with what others are writing. Such is one of those times for me.


  • 200,000 in Va. may lack proper ID needed to vote ( – This story now begins with this correction.

    Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that 450,000 voters lack proper identification to cast ballots in Virginia. The correct number is 200,000.

    The title of that article changed too, of course.

    The problem is the usual scary newspaper headline and the lack of emphasis on the plain fact nobody knows how many eligible voters lack a valid ID.

    If we actually read the article, we find out that nobody will be denied the right to vote, but everyone has to have a photo ID, and those are available for free.

  • Rand Paul’s coherent foreign policy ( – Senator Rand Paul has not supported most of our nation’s recent military actions in the Middle East. Nevertheless, he supports bombing ISIS. Is he being consistent or pandering to the polls. This is an editorial that argues Paul is being consistent. I particularly thought this quote relevant.

    In his Heritage Foundation speech, Mr. Paul accepted the conventional view that the West was not in a conflict with Islam itself, but rather with radical elements within Islam. He added: “The problem is that this element is no small minority, but a vibrant, often mainstream, vocal and numerous minority.” Whole countries, he noted, adhere to certain radical concepts of Islam, and the Muslim peoples are animated by powerful political sentiments born of a long history of frustration and passion. “Radical Islam,” he declared, “is no fleeting fad, but a relentless force,” one that makes up for its military weakness “with unlimited zeal.”

    One thing I have slowly come to understand is that we cannot trust what anyone says about anyone else. Is Senator Paul a foreign policy radical? Well, depending upon our own viewpoint he may seem like one. However, what any politician’s critics say about him is going to be distorted. Inevitably, our own biases intrude. So before we judge Senator Paul’s stance on the issues, we need to listen to the man first. We must compare what he says against our own point-of-view, not someone else’s. Therefore, I recommend Senator Paul’s Heritage Foundation speech.


  • I support Jeanine Lawson for Brentsville District Supervisor ( – Republicans will be choosing their nominee for the special election to replace Brentsville District Supervisor Wally Covington on October 1, 2014 (see Brentsville Special Election). This post is a well-considered endorsement of Jeanine Lawson.
  • Polling for Marriage ( – Polling in support of same-sex marriage is decreasing.  That’s good news, but I especially enjoyed this quote.

    Accusing someone of being on the wrong side of history says nothing about whether he is on the right side of the argument. It is a mere threat, and a somewhat hollow one. History is an arbitrary enforcer. (from here)

  • Shak Hill 2014 ( – The guy Republicans nominated as their candidate for the Senate here in Virginia, Ed Gillespie, is not catching on yet. I suspect the voters are still yawning, trying to finger out the difference between an Establishment Republican and Senator Mark Warner. Since there are real differences, we would be better off with Ed Gillespie, but I sure wish we had nominated Shak Hill. However, no matter who runs against Warner, it seems we are going to have some funny business. For some reason, my antivirus software seems concerned about the safety of Gillespie’s website, but it has no concerns about Mark Warner’s campaign website. Are some users reporting Gillespie’s website as part of a phishing scheme? Could be. Is it a political dirty trick? Democrats would never do that sort of thing, would they?
  • This Parallel Between LBJs And Obamas War Plans Will Terrify You ( – Black or white President Obama is first and foremost a politician, and he behaves like Liberal Democrat politician. Therefore, we can expect him to manage military operations like previous Liberal Democrats. Hence, while some people were hoping that the Obama administration would do something about ISIS, others just wished the White House and Congress would give our military forces the resources they need and then let them do their job.
  • Christianity and Progressivism ( – This post springs from a post I wrote, WHY ARE POLITICS AND RELIGION LOST SUBJECTS IN AMERICA? The post makes some interesting observations, and the commentary that follows it is very interesting too.

POSTS WORTH READING — September 16, 2014



  • Don’t Give the Masters of the Universe Their Amnesty ( – This article by Senator Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) begins as an exhortation on the subject of amnesty for illegal aliens. Then it progresses to an analysis of how what C.S. Lewis would have called the “Inner Ring” (speech at Kings College called the “Inner Ring) is stealing our freedom from us.
  • Success or Failure? ( – In this editorial, Thomas Sowell takes issue with “Those people who say that President Obama has no clear vision and no clear strategy for dealing with the ISIS terrorists in the Middle East.” Sowell suggests Obama has a strategy; it is just not a strategy that is in our nation’s best interests.
  • Why Britain is poorer than any US state, other than Mississippi ( – The article really doesn’t answer the question, but it interesting anyway, particularly for those of us who want America to be more like Europe.


  • WOULD YOU BUY A PIG IN A POKE? ( – Here is a blog that kicks in every election season. Why? It seems that every election we vote for far too many candidates who offer us a pig in a poke. If your congressional district is in northern Virginia, you will definitely find it worth your while to check this post.
  • President Bush Predicted What Is Happening In Iraq ( – Here the title explains the post. After reading Sowell’s article (above), how can we say Obama did not know what would happen? Nobody told him?
  • Not Islamic? If terrorists aren’t Muslims, why give them Korans when imprisoned? ( – I need to summarize a tweet?
  • Master and Servant ( – Here is a post that reminds us that no matter what our station in this life, in the next we are equally accountable to God.
  • What is Confucianism? ( – Here is one blog post in a series that compares the religions of the world with Christianity.