Is there some truth to the graphic above? Yes, but the players at the various levels have changed considerably. In addition, Capitalism is not the problem. The problem is the abuse of government power.
We elect our political leadership. Shouldn’t that solve the problem of the abuse of power? No. We actually do have a “WE FOOL YOU” class. Instead of a clergy that occasionally misrepresents the Will of God, we now have government-run education, entertainment business (including the fake news media) and the technocrats of Big Tech.
THINK! If we don’t have good information — if we believe enough lies — we will vote for the wrong people. It seems the people in the government-run education, the entertainment business and Big Tech think their jobs are to fool us into voting for the wrong people.
Are the clergy lying to us? Some are. Most probably believe what they say. Being a member of the clergy is not an easy job. Except for a few, it does not pay that well. The people knowingly propagating lies are in government-run education, the news media and Big Tech. Whatever indoctrination the clergy is capable of doing pales by comparison.
What about the military? It takes muscle to run a country, but the would-be tyrant class still doesn’t have solid control of our country. Moreover, by law we don’t permit our military forces to be used against us. So, government security agencies, including the IRS, have replaced the military.
Who eats for us? Well, government employees and contractors certainly earn large paychecks and benefits. Government jobs are cushier than they use to be.
Where then should we place the military and our local police forces in the graphic above? Those folks are down at the bottom with the rest of us. However, given enough time the corrupt among our rulers will turn our military forces and our local police forces against us too. That is why Liberal Democrats have turned the military into a social engineering program. That is why Liberal Democrats are trying to replace the police with social workers. They want to replace the people in the military and in local police forces with people who will do their dirty work.
Does all that sound too extreme? Do you believe the people who tell us that we can choose our gender, that we have seventy different choices? Yes? Then how can you find anything I just proposed too hard to believe?
We have mounting evidence. Consider what Elon Musk revealed about Twitter censorship of Conservatives via Matt Taibbi.
Taibbi will probably be cranking out tweets for a while. Good advertising for Twitter. That bird sure needed to change its ways.
With respect to Matt Taibbi tweets, the key example of censorship relates to Hunter Biden’s laptop. That laptop helps to establish that Hunter Biden’s father, “the big guy,” was receiving money — bribes — as the result of Hunter’s business deals with foreign enemies.
Taibbi admits that the records he reviewed did not show a direct government tie in between government officials and Twitter executives. It simply shows that Twitter did try to influence the election outcome. Nevertheless, we should remember that Mark Zuckerburg said that the FBI asked him to suppress Russian propaganda.
So, we know of an example of a direct government censorship tie in between a Big Tech executive and government officials.
Is Musk holding back more information? Probably => https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11497495/Elon-Musk-teases-explosive-Twitter-censorship-revelations-today-Hunter-Biden-laptop.html.
What Taibbi does make clear is that Twitter censored the Hunter Biden laptop story, and we have good reason to believe that widespread knowledge of the story would have affected the outcome of the election.
Taibbi also observes that Jack Dorsey, then the Twitter CEO, did not know about the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Did Dorsey want plausible deniability? Perhaps. It is difficult to believe that a CEO who has been called into Congress to testify about such matters would not keep on top of such issues unless he made a deliberate choice to be kept out of the loop.
What does the news media have to say about what Elon Musk has released about Twitter’s censorship?
- https://nypost.com/2022/12/03/who-is-matt-taibbi-journalist-behind-hunter-biden-twitter-files/ and https://nypost.com/2022/12/03/journos-attack-reporter-matt-taibbi-for-exposing-musks-twitter-files/
Please read both Conservative Republican and Liberal Democrat publications. That is the only way to get anything close to the truth. Because everyone is biased, we have to verify that these publications are telling us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Then consider that Liberal Democrats have been telling us outright lies. Moreover, Liberal Democrats spend more ink telling us what to think about the people they cover than they do telling us what the people they cover are doing and have done. They simply ignore what they don’t want us to know about.
Consider also just how truly frightened we should be the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story. It is bad enough that we elected a truly incompetent, lying and doddering old man, but what if President Joe Biden is under the control of the Chinese Communist Party? Has he actually done anything to indicate otherwise? And why are so many of our elites still supporting Biden? What has he done right? Even if we believe in Global Warming, Biden has done more to make a mess of solving that problem than he has to fix it. Wrecking our economy is not good for the environment; that will just cripple our ability to come up with technical solutions, and other nations with less capacity to innovate will just pollute more.
Need some motivation. Here is an excellent video.
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
Thanks very much!
Interesting and informative post for readers to discern and learn about the First Amendment.
I assumed James Wood career ended for either his age, sickness, or death.
Sad to learn his career ended instead because of his belief that he is a victim of the DNC violation of his Right to Free speech.is the truth of the why he is no longer in movies.
I just wrote a post about the negative side of the Musk’s sin purchase of Twitter and wonder now if perhaps your post presents a positive side that guided his purpose and reasoning.
Regards and goodwill blogging.
I hope Musk figures how to make Twitter work properly. He is not going to satisfy everyone, but he can still make it a place where people can have decent discussions.
I too hope Musk will solve the Twitter conundrum which is related to tie proverb.
The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is slave to the lender. (Proverb 22:7)
In my opinion, the reason Musk decided to ban Ye’s Swastika David comment is because depends on business advertisements funds and he owns 44 billion to rich lenders.
The reality is Twitter is a free service and he is in essence a slave to borrowers to prevent them from blackballing him same as James Woods has been blackballed in Hollywood.
Another reality is too many people are impressionable and will believe everything the hear or read including those with mental problems or on drugs.
James Woods or anyone who attempts to sue someone is going to have to prove they were harmed which is no easy task to accomplish and requires a lot of up-front money to be paid to lawyers to prove to a jury.
But who knows, perhaps Musk will solve this conundrum.
Regards and goodwill blogging.
I cannot say you are wrong, but what you said about playing God is true. All political speech is hate speech to someone. In fact, Liberal Democrats have done a wonderful job of proofing just that. They hate speech that just a few years ago most people thought perfectly sane. In fact, most people still do.