Supposedly, in The Secret Bipartisan Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election | Time, Time Magazine has revealed the plot to steal the 2020 election. That would be something of an overstatement. What is certain is that Time is attempting to justify the plot and congratulate the thieves.
Imagine the perfidy required to justify undermining the integrity of our elections. Imagine the haughty arrogance that demands without any serious investigation that we believe election results that don’t make any sense. Imagine the hypocrisy of a news media organization that justifies censorship. Imagine accusing your opponent nonstop of exactly what you yourself are actually doing. Imagine the praise you would gain from Time Magazine.
What should Time‘s article mean to us? We need to start setting aside the nonsense news organs like Time generate. We need to start paying more attention how we beat them in elections. We don’t have a choice. We need to out organize them.
“The successful warrior is the average man, with laser-like focus.” ― Bruce Lee
Quote by Bruce Lee: “The successful warrior is the average man, wit…” (goodreads.com)
Why would anyone want to be a warrior? What does the successful warrior focus upon?
Soldier’s Creed
I am an American Soldier.
I am a warrior and a member of a team.
I serve the people of the United States, and live the Army Values.
I will always place the mission first.
I will never accept defeat.
I will never quit.
I will never leave a fallen comrade.
I am disciplined, physically and mentally tough, trained and proficient in my warrior tasks and drills.
I always maintain my arms, my equipment and myself.
I am an expert and I am a professional.
I stand ready to deploy, engage, and destroy, the enemies of the United States of America in close combat.
I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life.
I am an American Soldier.
Soldier’s Creed – Army Values
Do you have things you want to do in this life? Do you have a mission statement, at least unspoken, for each of the things you want to do with your life? Have you prioritized these different mission statements? Do you actually have a purpose for your life? Are you fighting to accomplish each of your missions, or are you letting people you don’t even respect use you for their own purposes?
Consider.
When you have a laser focus, and you get distracted by what other people say, you can lose that laser focus. ― Anne Wojcicki
Anne Wojcicki – When you have a laser focus, and you get… (brainyquote.com)
Do you get distracted? There are only so many hours in the day. As a good citizen, do you know what you have to do to ensure that we have a good government, or do you just count upon others to do your work for you? How is that working out? What do we lose when we do not have control of our government? Don’t we lose control of our lives, our ability to fulfill the purpose we have set for our lives?
Think about the last year. How much of the economic shutdown was necessary? How many businesses died for no good reason? How many people lost their jobs for no good reason? How many people spent hours alone and lonely for no good reason?
What does a laser produce? A dot? What if instead of being focused like a laser, we focus on the dot? What follows is a video illustration.
Funny? Imagine that someone with a laser focus on their mission has us chasing dots. Chasing a laser dot is for kittens, not warriors focused on their mission.
Consider how Time summarizes its article.
This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group’s inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster. “Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,” says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. “But it’s massively important for the country to understand that it didn’t happen accidentally. The system didn’t work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.”
The Secret Bipartisan Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election | Time
Their intentions may not have been any good, but even people doing things they should not be doing can have a laser focus on doing bad things. This is why self government doesn’t happen accidentally. When we the People don’t participate with a laser focus, majoritarian tyranny, what outfits like Time call democracy, can swiftly replace our constitutional republic. When we let self appointed rulers run our country in the name of the majority, they will run our lives with a laser focus on their missions. Then each of us will lose the right to choose our own purpose and to define our own missions. We will be their slaves.
Additional References
- Time Magazine Uses Interesting Word to Explain How 2020 Election Was Pretty Much Rigged by Matt Vespa (townhall.com)
- WOW! TIME Magazine Admits in Great Detail How 2020 Election Was Rigged Against Trump by Secret Cabal of Wealthy and Politically Connected Elites (thegatewaypundit.com)
- TIME Claims a Secret Cabal Manipulated the 2020 Election to Stop Trump, and People Have Questions (redstate.com)
- ‘Cabal’ Formed ‘Shadow Campaign’ To Fortify 2020 Election, Time Reports | The Daily Caller
- Time report touts ‘cabal of of powerful people’ behind ‘conspiracy,’ ‘shadow campaign’ to shape election | Fox News
This is one of my favorite quotes from the Additional References. The quote is referring to the article in Time.
“If you had said this out loud on Twitter a few months ago, it would have gotten you banned,” RealClearInvestigations senior writer Mark Hemingway said.
Time report touts ‘cabal of of powerful people’ behind ‘conspiracy,’ ‘shadow campaign’ to shape election | Fox News
You can’t make this stuff up.
Citizen Tom 
““Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,” says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group.”
“Interfere with the proper outcome”?!? This is the philosophy of the communist party! Xi Jinping would agree completely! Pure Marxist rhetoric. Welcome to Venezuela’s version of “democracy!”
What this article exposed for everyone to see is the “doublethink” of the leftist hivemind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink
They manipulate words in order to confuse people and diffuse any opposition to what they’re actually doing. I’m not even sure if they realize what they’ve just confessed to in the Time Magazine article. But anyone with any discernment understands. What they’re actually saying is that “protecting democracy” means protecting our one-party totalitarian regime. Elections are only fair and democracy preserved if we win.
@Mel Wild
Given the circumstances, I would have to agree. Traditionally, when a candidate complained so vociferously, elected officials would have exposed his foolishness by throughly investigating the matter. Did not happen. The Establishment just called people names.
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
Thanks for the reblog.
Letting the government “police” themselves is akin to letting an abuser decide his/her own punishment. The government should NOT be above the law. Enough with their “committees,” if it looks like a crime and smells like a crime, the police (not the FBI) should be called in, people should be arrested and then we take a look at the evidence. That’s what would happen if a citizen was suspected, right? Have you watched the Mike Lindell documentary yet? Really interested.
I intend to watch Lindell’s documentary today. The video is also located here => https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/mike-lindell-bannon-war-room-absolute-truth-film-seen-10-million-people-friday-release/
Such an appalling article, Tom! A bit like that cat with a laser dot, I like to go right for the words and the often hidden meaning resting in them. So like “Democracy is not self-executing” so you just have to infuse the election with controls in order to manifest the only acceptable result, is just fancy schmancy talk for, “we stole it because we thought we knew better than the will of the people.”
Also, the “secret bipartisan campaign” is just what us little folks refer to as “the swamp.”
I’m not sure how we proceed from here and my heart goes out to some of our local grassroots Republican leadership because all they know how to do is say “we just have to work harder this time, vote more,” and those of us on the bottom outside of the establishments are just like, Why? If elections can be stolen then you’re just pouring your efforts into a leaky bucket and it is futile. I don’t have any answers, but a bit like people keep saying “we’re just going to get this vaccine and life will get back to normal,” uh no. I like the optimism and the can do spirit, but I’m afraid people are not being realistic and they’re in denial about the situation we find ourselves in.
@insanitybytes22
Liberal Democrats don’t want normalcy. They want power. They believe this.
Violence is a poor way to maintain a constitutional republic. It is as foolish as trying to save capitalism with socialism.
Liberal Democrats, unfortunately, believe that they have a right to whatever government gives them, that government gives them their rights. They don’t take the Constitution seriously, except as an obstacle to the “rights” they want government to give them.
To replace Liberal Democrat officials, we must restore the integrity of our elections. When an elected officials get in the way ensuring election integrity, we must ostracize those individuals, picket their homes and place of business, and otherwise seek to make their lives miserable. The left calls that “canceling,” and they have no trouble using government power to make it happen. The old fashion phrase for it is “civil disobedience,” but “civil disobedience arises from the conscience of the people, not their hatred.
Why civil disobedience? The people we are fighting will do their best to make it illegal to oppose them. They will deny us if they can our First Amendment rights. No matter what the Constitution says, they will use legal sanctions against us.
How do we minimize the violence against us? We must immediately set out to fight the Liberal Democrat agenda. If we give them time to consolidate their hold on power, they will eventually reach the point of bloodshed. Even without serious opposition tyrants cannot resist the opportunity to display their power.
“When an elected officials get in the way ensuring election integrity, we must ostracize those individuals, picket their homes and place of business, and otherwise seek to make their lives miserable. ”
Tom, you have lost your way. This is from my point of view, how self-radicalisation starts. You are trying to convince yourself and your readers, that violence is an acceptable solution, that intimidation is an acceptable solution. This is the wrong way.
@marmoewp
“Canceling” someone is okay when Democrats do it, but demonstrating against a corrupt official is violence when Conservatives do it?
I grew up during the 1960’s when Martin Luther King was practicing civil disobedience. I understand the difference between violence and civil disobedience. Do you?
With civil disobedience, MLK forced change. He clearly made some politicians so miserable that they had to give in.
Martin Luther King picketed the homes of elected officials?!?
Martin Luther King had his supporters make the personal life of political opponents and their families miserable?!?
That was Martin Luther King’s civil disobedience?!?
In what parallel universe are you living?
@marmoewp
Ohhh, is that what Liberal Democrats do?
And no, picketing the homes of politicians is not OK, regardless of which party they belong to and who is doing the picketing.
@marmoewp
You worry too much. When the homes of Liberal Democrats are targeted by other Liberal Democrats for demonstrations, that when they suddenly decide property rights need to be respected. That’s when they allow the police to do their job.