President Donald Trump is engaged in what could prove to be an exercise in futility, hunting for an honest court just as Diogenes once hunted for an honest man. Trump has been searching for an honest court to take his case, to honestly consider his case for election fraud. At this point, Trump has pinned his hopes on the challenge from Texas, 17 states back Texas, ask Supreme Court to hear election challenge – Washington Times.
Has the state of Texas put together a good case for setting aside the election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania? This is one of those occasions we each have to decide for ourselves. Since the so-called mainstream media has offered a torrent of ridicule, I will just point to some conservative publications and suggest you read what Texas has put together.
- Ken Paxton to Newsmax TV: ‘This Is Our Last Chance’ | Newsmax.com
- President Trump asks Ted Cruz to argue Texas case before SCOTUS: report – TheBlaze
- State AG Ken Paxton Explains Legal Position of Texas in Supreme Court Election Lawsuit – The Last RefugeThe Last Refuge (theconservativetreehouse.com)
- 6 Things To Know About Texas’s Supreme Court Petition On The Election (thefederalist.com)
Also, here is the email I sent to my congressman. My senators are rabid Democrats.
Dear Congressman Rob Wittman
Thus far you have been quiet about the charges of unconstitutionally run elections and election fraud in a number of key swing states. Yet we all know that what went down in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and several other states reeks to high heaven. Unfortunately, no court wants to take on the challenge posed by fraudulent election of Joe Biden, the first candidate to run a winning presidential campaign from his basement. No court wants to seriously consider the evidence and the unconstitutional nature of the elections run in key states. Why? Too many elected Republican are too risk adverse. Unlike President Donald Trump, they won’t fight.
If Biden wins the White House as the result of such blatant election fraud then the trend is clear. Our constitutional republic is collapsing, and no one will be safe. So, at this point not one of us has anything to lose. As Benjamin Franklin once said: either we hang together, or we will most assuredly hang separately.
Sir, we cannot allow the precedents set by this election to stand. We know how to run an honest election, but this one looks like Democrats used the 2005 Carter-Baker Report as a road map to cheat -> https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/20/7-ways-the-2005-carter-baker-report-could-have-averted-problems-with-2020-election/.
Democrats boldly proclaim “there is no evidence”. When Democrat did not follow the rules provided by our Constitution, why do need evidence? When Democrats refused to allow poll observers, when the rules require them to allow poll observers, why do we need evidence?
Because Democrats did not follow the rules that would have assured the integrity of the election, we have no reason to believe the results. As it is, there is plenty of evidence and abundant reason to be suspicious.
As an elected official you have an obligation to do your best to ensure the integrity of our election systems. That includes putting some steel in the spines of wavering members of the Supreme Court. Unless we all speak up, especially leaders like yourself, not enough good people will have the courage to resist then encroachment of tyranny.December 10, 2020 email
Another thought. Why didn’t the Liberal Democrat news media tell us about this before the election?
- Tucker Carlson Rips Mainstream Media for Election Rigging (rumble.com)
- The media’s biggest detractors have field day slamming them for dismissing Hunter Biden story prior to election (washingtonexaminer.com)
- Hunter Biden Media Defense Team Assemble! Network Hacks Parrot Dem Talking Points | Newsbusters
BONUS! Who is Diogenes of Sinope | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (utm.edu), and what did he have to do with Alexander the Great? Plutarch | Biography, Works, & Facts | Britannica told this story.
Thereupon many statesmen and philosophers came to Alexander with their congratulations, and he expected that Diogenes of Sinope also, who was tarrying in Corinth, would do likewise. But since that philosopher took not the slightest notice of Alexander, and continued to enjoy his leisure in the suburb Craneion, Alexander went in person to see him; and he found him lying in the sun. Diogenes raised himself up a little when he saw so many people coming towards him, and fixed his eyes upon Alexander. And when that monarch addressed him with greetings, and asked if he wanted anything, “Yes,” said Diogenes, “stand a little out of my sun.” It is said that Alexander was so struck by this, and admired so much the haughtiness and grandeur of the man who had nothing but scorn for him, that he said to his followers, who were laughing and jesting about the philosopher as they went away, “But truly, if I were not Alexander, I wish I were Diogenes.”Diogenes and Alexander – Wikipedia
Diogenes is more famous for his search for an honest man. Diogenes never did find an honest man. Did Diogenes fail because he was cynic, or was he a cynic because he failed to find an honest man? The Bible says there has only been one honest, good man. So, perhaps Diogenes had cause for his cynicism. The Bible also has a few choice words about judges.