KARL MARX WAS A GREAT FAN A PUBLIC EDUCATION

What is one of the big ego trips in this world? It is making other people believe what “I believe”. Admittedly, I blog in part because I want to encourage others to believe what “I believe”. However, I am not trying to force anyone to believe what I believe, and I am not trying to suppress the beliefs of others. Some will not abide with such constraints.

If one lacks scruples, what is the latest scheme for forcing others to believe what “I believe”? Well, I would have to do more research than I want to do to credit the very first such innovator and the date he or she published his invention. So I will credit the noisiest and most blunt inventor instead.

What was the idea? Public education. If we want people to believe what “I believe”, and we have the power, then the easiest thing to do is to tax the people, put their children in public schools, and teach those children what “I believe”. Then, not only will we have taught the next generation what “I believe”, we will be in a better position to rule the world (see The Hand That Rocks The Cradle Is The Hand That Rules The World).

Exactly how does this work? Well, let’s consider what happened here. Where did we start? What has changed?

Where did we start? Before we became a nation,  American colonists taught their children at home and in cooperation with other parents in their local communities. When these parents helped each other to teach their children, they learned to peacefully share their values. Since every society bases its laws upon shared moral values, their voluntary and cooperative efforts in education provided a solid foundation for our nation.

From whence came the moral values of our nation? The Bible. We have a Christian heritage, and the Bible codifies that heritage. From the Bible the founders of this nation created laws that matched their Christian heritage.

So what has changed? Unfortunately when they put the government in charge of educating their children, the people of this country did not realize the problem it would create. They did not realize that they had just begun the process of secularizing the education of our nation’s children. They did not realize they had just created a system that would slowly undermine our nation’s values.

Initially, education was a local concern, the province of small communities. Because the population grew and became urbanized, those small communities have mostly disappeared. Because power gravitates towards the central government, the education function gravitated towards state governments, and it is now moving towards the Federal Government. As a result, large bureaucratic institutions — over which parents have little control — now educate most of our nation’s children.

Because our government is a secular institution, the Federal Government in particular, our government demands the exclusion of Christian content from education. Hence, a school system that once had a rich Christian curriculum no longer has any such thing.

Because this process took many decades, most of us think this is just the way it should be, but it isn’t. We should want parents in charge of the education of their children, not politicians nobody trusts.

To maintain a republic, the People must establish the moral character of the nation. When  politicians can connive to dictate morality, the People lose control. Then we no longer have government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Instead, we have whatever the elites can convince us is for our own individual good. Instead, we have a degenerating society.

What is a degenerating society? It is a society of people where each soul only thinks of itself. In a degenerate society, who worries about what is good for their neighbors? Each is too worried about me, myself and I. Each has become a meebot (see The rise of the meebot). And that sort of degeneration is exactly what we are seeing today.

What does public education most undermine? The family, and this is becoming more and more  deliberate. Don’t think so? Then read this excerpt from the Manifesto of the Communist Party (published1888) by Karl Marx.

That culture, the loss of which he laments, is, for the enormous majority, a mere training to act as a machine.

But don’t wrangle with us so long as you apply, to our intended abolition of bourgeois property, the standard of your bourgeois notions of freedom, culture, law, etc. Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class made into a law for all, a will, whose essential character and direction are determined by the economical conditions of existence of your class.

The selfish misconception that induces you to transform into eternal laws of nature and of reason, the social forms springing from your present mode of production and form of property-historical relations that rise and disappear in the progress of production — this misconception you share with every ruling class that has preceded you. What you see clearly in the case of ancient property, what you admit in the case of feudal property, you are of course forbidden to admit in the case of your own bourgeois form of property.

Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you will say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention, direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, etc.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the whole bourgeoisie in chorus.

The bourgeois sees in his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion than that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.

He has not even a suspicion that the real point is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.

Our bourgeois, not content with having the wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives.

Bourgeois marriage is in reality a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with, is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private. (from here)

Marx was a great fan of public education. He advocated for a “free” education for all children in public schools, and he did so fully intending to undermine the family and the values of Western Civilization.

Marx may have been wrong about the historical inevitably of Communism, but he was square on the mark about what could be done with public education.

What is the most important thing we teach our children? What does the Bible teach us?

Proverbs 4:1-9 New King James Version (NKJV)

Hear, my children, the instruction of a father,
And give attention to know understanding;
For I give you good doctrine:
Do not forsake my law.
When I was my father’s son,
Tender and the only one in the sight of my mother,
He also taught me, and said to me:
“Let your heart retain my words;
Keep my commands, and live.
Get wisdom! Get understanding!
Do not forget, nor turn away from the words of my mouth.
Do not forsake her, and she will preserve you;
Love her, and she will keep you.
Wisdom is the principal thing;
Therefore get wisdom.
And in all your getting, get understanding.
Exalt her, and she will promote you;
She will bring you honor, when you embrace her.
She will place on your head an ornament of grace;
A crown of glory she will deliver to you.”

(continued here)

We can teach our children everything there is to know. Yet if they cannot discern the difference between good and evil, what good is it? If we have not taught our children to love and obey God, to care about each other, what kinds of lives will they live?

20 thoughts on “KARL MARX WAS A GREAT FAN A PUBLIC EDUCATION

  1. Education is easily one of the best methods for indoctrinating a nation. Even worse, if you have a system split into private and public education then the paying side acquire the means to teach a curriculum which better prepares the students than the public side.

    Like

    1. A system split into private and public education? That is what we have, and it is slowly leading to a caste system. Frankly, I think the short term solution is system wholly financed through educational vouchers. If people want to give their vouchers to public schools, that is okay with me, but the public school system has such a huge advantage right now that many people cannot afford to send there children anywhere else.

      Democrats call themselves pro-choice, but the thing they are most pro-choice about is killing babies in the womb. When it comes to raising and educating children, they seem altogether uninterested in giving parents a choice.

      Like

  2. Speaking as an atheist, I would agree personally with those religious types who declare that it is on one’s conscience to believe what one will, answerable only to a higher power, rather than to buckle under and follow the crowd.

    The true religious-based skeptic, whose word is his bond, does not need to follow. He can lead — if he so chooses. All he requires is the conviction that others will judge him fairly and listen to his words with an even scale that is unweighted one side or the other. — S.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Well, the Christian would appear to have a harder lot than the true religious-based skeptic. Because all men are sinners, we don’t expect others will judge us fairly and listen to our words with an even scale that is unweighted one side or the other. That is why we rest our hope in our Lord Jesus Christ. Then, because our faith is in Him, we can have boundless hope.

      Like

  3. The idea and implementation of public education started in the late 18th and early 19th century in Prussia.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_education_system
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humboldtian_model_of_higher_education

    Is this post an example of the quality of the kind of education you want to give in homeschooling, Tom? At a guess, Karl Marx was a great fan of breathing, too. Would that tell us anything about whether or not breathing is good for you?

    Like

  4. It seems that more and more families are opting for home schooling or private education in order to get these values restored. Unfortunately that is a great sacrifice for those doing it, because they’re still paying taxes for public education. For those still in the public education system, they need to be aware of what is being taught. Attending school board meetings is essential as well. Silent voices are not heard. It’s the loud guys that make a difference. I agree that we have become more socialistic than democratic over time, mostly because we’ve become so politically correct – trying to please everyone.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Agreed!

      Homeschooling or private schooling can be a big sacrifice. Lots of people just can’t afford the cost, and high taxes are one reason why.

      People can have great effect on School Boards, but the time involved is horrendous. Lots of people don’t have the time, or they don’t even know where to start.

      Another problem is the way we manage our educational system. There are actually four management levels: the School Board, the city or county government, the state government, and the Federal Government. If a foreign government had try to impose a management nightmare like that on us, we we fight before we would submit.

      Liked by 2 people

  5. As a retired school teacher I realize that mostly the public education system is nothing more than a holding tank for kids. With today’s technology, there is no need for classrooms as all of it could be done at home. This is contrary to the social nanny of the school that is to indoctrinate youthful minds. It could be said that the schools don’t work because they don’t want them to work for if they worked some in power would lose that position. I believe this is generally true for the far left and hard-core liberals who need the masses as dependents who gleefully look up to them.

    Liked by 2 people

      1. Yes, yes, and that is the problem. Americans have been convinced that mom and dad where there is one are to pursue their careers and that it takes two to live the lifestyle they desire. NO the function and viability of the family is more important. This inter-dependency and dependency role we have with each other is killing us.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. I once felt a great need to convince others to believe what I believe. I’ve learned that what I believe, while it is not always wrong, is seldom 100% right. Instead, I am learning to encourage others to challenge what they believe and just maybe they will grow and teach me a few things.

    A society that shoves a one size fits all version of wishy washy morality and politically correct rules on people is headed for a life (and death) of lemmings.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. @Mike Ridenour

      Agree with you. Not trying to tell others how to educate their children. My objective is to stop people from using the government to force everyone into that one size fits all version of wishy washy morality and politically correct rules. It is the wrong use government.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I wasn’t pointing a finger at you. I was trying to make a point without pointing…lol. If I were to call someone out on this one, it wouldn’t be you. We are on the same page on the use of education to spread an agenda.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. Amen,Tom. One of the best things we did for our kids was to pull them all out of school at various times and home school. I wish we had done it their whole lives,but even those few years made all the difference in the world. They can actually think for themselves. LOL, sometimes I wish they didn’t think for themselves quite so much!

    But I look at my kids today and many of their challenges and problems actually stem from public education, from college even, from what the culture has tried to tell them is true. Israel is a good example, the “huge country oppressing all the middle east with their relentless colonization.” Finally got one kid to find me Israel on a globe. It’s that tiny dot you can barely see, surrounded on all sides by some huge and powerful countries. That alone totally changes the nature of the story, what you think you know about global affairs.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. One of the books the Framers of the Constitution were familiar with is Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu’s The Spirit of laws. That is the book that gave them the ideas about the separation of powers and the checks and balances between the branches of government. In his book, Montesquieu looked at various governments around the world. The best he could say about the various Islamic states is that they tended to be stable, backwards, and tyrannical. That is why little Israel with a little help from us is a match for all of them together, and that is what our children have trouble understanding. They cannot see the real difference between good and evil. How Hollywood portrays evil has nothing to do with reality.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. it is time to end secular and atheist subversion and restore the good order in the USA.

    If interested, read the following post which I believe supports this Citizen Tom’s post message to restore religious wisdom, the foundation of our Constitution, in our school teachings of our children.

    King Solomon, Church and State Wall War Declaration

    https://rudymartinka.com/2018/01/10/king-solomon-church-and-state-wall-war-declaration/

    Regards and goodwill blogging.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Well said! The great frontier of the conservative movement should be radical reform of our public education system. While it periodically gets some focus, it seems to get lost in the shuffle, much to our long term dismay.

    Thanks for highlighting this. Please consider more articles supporting reform.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Because The Bible Wasn't Written In English

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

Fr. Pietraszko's Corner

Discovering Truth and Love

Victory Girls Blog

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

Through Ink & Image

...Pursuing a God Inspired Life

The Wesleyan Tribe

A lifelong United Methodist Speaking Into The Chaos Of Today

D. Patrick Collins

liberating christian thought

Healthy Mind Ministry

A Ministry Devoted To Mental Wellness Through Jesus Christ

Conservative Government

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

The Night Wind

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

Reclaim Our Republic

Knowledge Is Power

John Branyan

something funny is occurring

In Saner Thought

"It is the duty of every man, as far as his ability extends, to detect and expose delusion and error"..Thomas Paine

Christians in Motion

Why be stagnant?

SGM

Faithful servants never retire. You can retire from your career, but you will never retire from serving God. – Rick Warren

Communio

"Behold, I have come to do your will, O God." Heb. 10:7

All Along the Watchtower

A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you ... John 13:34

The Bull Elephant

Conservative and libertarian news, analysis, and entertainment

Always On Watch: Semper Vigilans

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

The Family Foundation Blog - The Family Foundation

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

Cry and Howl

Let not him that girdeth on his harness boast himself as he that putteth it off. I Kings 20:11

praythroughhistory

Heal the past. Free the present. Bless the future.

Dr. Lloyd Stebbins

Deliberate Joy

Lillie-Put

The place where you can find out what Lillie thinks

He Hath Said

is the source of all wisdom, and the fountain of all comfort; let it dwell in you richly, as a well of living water, springing up unto everlasting life

partneringwitheagles

WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE OF THESE ENDS (LIFE,LIBERTY,AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS) IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO ALTER OR ABOLISH IT, AND TO INSTITUTE A NEW GOVERNMENT...

PUMABydesign001's Blog

“I hope we once again have reminded people that man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: as government expands, liberty contracts.” Ronald Reagan.

nebraskaenergyobserver

The view from the Anglosphere

Freedom Through Empowerment

Taking ownership of your life brings power to make needed changes. True freedom begins with reliance on God to guide this process and provide what you need.

bluebird of bitterness

The opinions expressed are those of the author. You go get your own opinions.

Pacific Paratrooper

This WordPress.com site is Pacific War era information

The Isaiah 53:5 Project

Life: the time God gives you to determine how you spend eternity

THE RIVER WALK

Daily Thoughts and Meditations as we journey together with our Lord.

My Daily Musing

With God we will gain the victory, and he will trample our enemies. Psalms 109:13

atimetoshare.me

My Walk, His Way - daily inspiration

Rudy u Martinka

What the world needs now in addition to love is wisdom. Wisdom to help us find the path to true love, peace, and joy in our lives, and our world.

Truth in Palmyra

By Wally Fry

Kingdom Pastor

Living Freely In God's Kingdom

In My Father's House

"...that where I am you may be also." Jn.14:3

cookiecrumbstoliveby

Life through the eyes of "cookie"

The Lions Den

"Blending the colorful issues of life with the unapologetic truth of scripture." ColorStorm

%d bloggers like this: