Yesterday an illegal alien got off with one charge, illegal possession of a firearm. That was after he apparently stole a firearm and then killed a young woman, Kate Steinle, with ricochet bullet. Since the facts of the case were not in question, it is apparent that the acquittal of murder charges flabbergasted more than a few people. Rather than repeat what others have already done, here are several posts on the subject.
- If you’re an illegal alien in San Francisco you can get away with murder … as long as you kill an innocent American citizen by Cry and Howl.
- VIDEO Open Boarder Advocates ‘Share Responsibility for Preventable Crimes’ – Feds Have Zarate – USA Lives at Risk by ror1774
- Kate Steinle Killing Verdict Does Prove A Few Things Beyond A Shadow Of Doubt by John
What is my own opinion? Well, Garcia Zarate, was not suppose to have a gun, and we rarely find stolen guns just lying on the street. Moreover, guns don’t just fire themselves. If you or I were a felon in possession of a stolen gun, and we started firing it in the general direction of other people, we would be put in jail for murder. Our neighbors know that guns don’t kill people, but people with guns can use guns to kill people. The folks in San Francisco, however, apparently have a different standard for Zarate. I wonder why. What is the point in letting this guy off? It makes no sense.
As the posts above indicate, Zarate had a criminal record. It is not obvious why the jury let him off so easy, but they apparently believed that Zarate’s story about finding the gun and firing it accidentally. To fire a gun, we pull the trigger. Who doesn’t know that?