Delegate Bob Marshall sent out this email a couple of days ago. What is he talking about? Here are several news articles describing the issue.
- Virginia Same-Sex Marriage Ban Rejected by Appeals Court (online.wsj.com)
- Virginia same-sex marriage ruling reverberates in North Carolina (www.washingtonpost.com)
- Appeals court strikes down Va. same-sex marriage ban (www.timesdispatch.com)
Same Sex Marriage – A Judicial Kiss of Death for America
In the long run, advocates and defenders of so-called same sex marriage are their own best undertakers for their hubris in attempting to deny and defy the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” by which nations and cultures around the world have recognized for millennia that marriage is a relationship between one man and one woman.
Although former Justice William O. Douglas explained that, “The Fourteenth Amendment was passed to give blacks first-class citizenship,” two Richmond federal judges ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment, written in the blood of 600,000+ Americans, was passed to establish same sex “marriage” as a civil right based on immoral behavior including acts that disqualify individuals from giving blood.
Judges Robert Gregory and Henry Floyd are ignorant of the purpose of the 14th Amendment, and arrogant to think they have the moral and legal authority to negate the votes of 1.3 million Virginia voters who gave their approval in 2006 to Virginia’s one-man, one-woman Marshall-Newman Marriage Amendment.
Judges Gregory and Floyd, who opine that two men or two women may “marry” each other do not define what they mean by “marriage,” don’t explain what consummates a homosexual “marriage” or why their decision does not support polygamy or marriages between adults and children “who love each other.” Will three lesbian women in Massachusetts, a “throuple,” move to Virginia to have their aberrant “marriage” relationship sanctioned by Judges Gregory and Floyd?
Massive legal and social coercion will be used by GLBT advocates to secure compliance with their amoral agenda. Photographers and bakers are being fined or forced to provide services to same sex “marriages” against their conscience. The “Human Rights Campaign” is now defending teachers fired from Catholic schools after marrying same-sex partners. Pastors who refuse to conduct same sex marriage ceremonies will be sued. Church charities that feed, clothe, house, and care for the less fortunate will suffer as these lawsuits increase.
The Bob Jones Supreme Court decision upheld IRS denial of tax exempt status because the school violated “public policy” by imposing race distinctions among students. The GLBT lobby claims refusing same-sex marriage is akin to discrimination based on skin color, when in reality sexual behavior is not the same as race. Equality of persons is not the same as equality of behavior.
If judicial elites impose a radical and immoral marriage regime on American citizens in defiance of the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” the result would be to tear the social fabric in ways that can scarcely be imagined, nor contained by judicial arrogance.
Keep in mind that what these judges have done undermines the rule of law. Judges are suppose to rule based upon what the law actually says, not their personal biases. To rule as these judges have ruled, they had to break their oath of office. They had to lie and say the law says what it clearly does not say. That is not ethical, but that is characteristic of the manner in which the advocates of same-sex marriage have been winning their cause.
If in order to win what is supposedly a right, advocates for same-sex “marriage” destroy the rule of law, what good is that? Is this what Gay Pride means? Rather than allow anyone to call what they do wrong, will homosexual “rights” advocates destroy everything?
Where have we seen such unbridled pride before?
Here we may reign secure, and in my choyce
To reign is worth ambition though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell, then serve in Heav’n.