A while back I sent a letter to Senator Jim Webb.  So he knows that I am interested in the Senate’s debate on health care reform.   On the 15th of December, the senator sent me an update, but his update found its way into my junk mail folder.  I recovered it.  Should I have bothered?  What do you think?

December 15, 2009

Mr. Citizen Tom

Dear Mr. Citizen Tom:

Knowing of your interest in the ongoing debate in Congress over health care reform, I wanted to update you on a number of votes and positions that I have taken during the process.

Together with 60 of my colleagues, I voted in favor of proceeding to debate the proposed health care reform legislation. I have yet to decide whether I will support final passage of the bill.

I have stated on several occasions my concerns that the Obama administration should have begun the health care process with a clear, detailed proposal, from which legislation could then be put into place. Instead, the legislation now before the Congress is the product of five separate congressional committees, three in the House and two in the Senate. I and my staff have carefully worked through thousands of pages of sometimes contradictory information, and have done our best to bring focus to the debate and clarity to any final product.

Our country needs health care reform. While a strong percentage of Americans are satisfied with their health care, the system is not working for millions of others. Spiraling costs for health care also have placed our biggest industries at a severe competitive disadvantage worldwide, and have become unsustainable for many small businesses.

But true reform must be done in an effective and responsible fashion, without creating a cumbersome, overly-bureaucratic system. The bottom line should be to achieve a more cost-effective health care system that increases accessibility, affordability, and quality of care, and which does not burden our economy along the way.

The process also requires openness, so that the American people understand exactly what is being debated. At the start of this debate I was one of eight Senators who called on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to post the text and complete budget scores of the health care bill on a public website for review at least 72 hours prior to both the first vote and final passage. This request was agreed to, affording proper transparency in the process.

Over the past few weeks, I have taken a number of difficult votes. As with every other issue since I came to the Senate I have voted my conscience throughout this process. I have broken with my party six times, including four votes to send the current legislation back to committee for a more thorough review. I voted five times against proposed cuts to Medicare due to my concerns about taking half a trillion dollars out of that system at a time when the pool for Medicare is about to expand with the retirement of those in the Baby Boom generation. I am a long-time supporter of Medicare Advantage programs which have, in my view, improved services in rural areas of Virginia, and I did not want to see cuts to benefits or services.

On the issue of abortion, I studied the bill closely to ensure that no taxpayer dollars will be used to fund abortions. I am convinced that this legislation strictly adheres to the requirements of the Hyde Amendment. It also includes clear conscience provisions for providers and consumers who elect to reject a plan that offers such coverage.

Since drug prices in the U.S. have risen dramatically in recent years (a 9% jump in 2009 alone) I have cosponsored an amendment to lower prescription drug costs. The measure would allow Americans to safely import lower-priced, Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs from other approved countries, and save the federal government nearly $20 billion over the next ten years.

In summary, I have been working actively to improve the health care reform bill for the good of our country and without bowing to party politics. As we continue to debate the bill and amend it, I remain hopeful that the Senate can reach consensus on fair and effective health care legislation. Whether this is so will determine my vote on final passage.

As the Senate continues to debate health care reform, please be assured that your views will be very helpful to me and my staff. I hope that you will continue to share your thoughts with us in the years ahead.

Thank you again for your interest in this important matter.


Jim Webb
United States Senator


Is the Senator Webb honestly torn?   To get a better idea, I investigated the amendment he has introduced on the importation of prescription drugs.  Here is the description on his website.  What is this amendment really about?  Consider how the Washington Post titled an article, Drugmakers fight plan to allow drug reimportation.  We would be sending drugs out of the country just so we can bring them back.  Only politicians would dream up such an idiot scheme.

Here is an article from the Heritage Foundation on the subject.  Since this issue periodically comes back, it is an old subject.  As Heritage Foundation also reports, the drug reimportation amendment failed today, Obamacare In The Senate: Middle Class Taxes And Drug Reimportation.

Webb support for such nonsense suggests he is more interested in fooling us than anything else.

Please pester him.  Let senator know he has no business considering the approval of an unconstitutional bill.  Maybe he can be persuaded to filibuster the so-called health care reform bill.

Here is the contact information for Virginia’s senators.

Warner, Mark R. – (D – VA) Class II
(202) 224-2023
Web Form:
Webb, Jim – (D – VA) Class I
(202) 224-4024
Web Form:

Other views

It appears that Senator Webb has personal reasons to believe in global warming.  According to the Virginia Politics Blog, Webb “centrist” is getting him some heat, Webb under fire on health care.

SWAC Girl reports upon one of the sources of that heat, Thousands of signatures delivered to Webb: “No nationalized health care”.

The Augusta Free Press reports the Virginia General Assembly is adding to the heat, Howell, Putney address concerns over health-care reform.

Bearing Drift asks about Webb’s courage.  Can he take the heat?   Will Webb vote for it before he votes against it?

At The Point Of A Gun provides video From The Code Red Protest: The View From Jim Webb’s Office.  This shows concerned citizens visiting the senator to turn up the heat.  This is better than listening the idiot journalists on the boob tube.  This is the opinions of real people who live real lives, not “reality TV.”



  1. John Doe

    Love your cartoons. Where do you get ’em? I tried to steal them, er, I mean borrow them, but my blog only takes downloaded jpg files, not gif.

    Great stuff, keep it comin’!


  2. Shucks! You want me to reveal all my trade secrets. 😀

    Here is where I get them from.

    Since you too use WordPress, you ought to be able to link to the URL. That is all I am doing. Most of them I do not bother to download and store on my PC. If you right click on a comic and display the properties, that should show the URL.


  3. Mike

    I got the exact same e-mail from Senator Webb. I’m really getting the feeling that both of these senators, which I voted for, are either cowards who are afraid to vote with their conscience (common sense) rather than follow their political party or they are liars who claimed to be middle of the road Democrats to get my vote. Either way, ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS and they have now lost my independent votes. Can we get more politicians like Senator Lieberman PLEASE!


  4. Mike – I am pleased to hear your suspicions of Warner and Webb. I just wish you were also less trusting of Lieberman. When Lieberman voted to end debate, he voted for a rotten health care bill, a bill that puts government in charge of our health care. Just to make certain a few people who cannot afford health care get health care, we do not need to put government in charge of it. That will lead to rationing. With rationing, we will have in effect government-run death panels.


  5. Mike

    I respect Senator Lieberman for standing up against political parties whether democrat or republican. If we had more of that, we wouldn’t have to be pushing for a huge bill to cover us from cradle to grave. If there are portions in the bill that are not bad (like pre-existing condition coverage). Why not pass those portions individually? It would get rid of a huge amount of pork, limit the confusion, and heck even speed the process.

    Appreciate your blog by the way. Nice to see some actual thought go into political coverage.


Comments are closed.