ANSWERS FOR COMMENTERS ON THE PREVIOUS POST: WHAT WILL WE DO ABOUT GEORGIA?

In the previous post, I was visited by three commenters.  When it became apparent the response would be lengthy, I decided to make it a post.

Response to MB’s comment – My biases are what they are, but anyone who reads your post can figure out the reference to old men.  The first post provided as recommended reading Georgia: A Reality Check for the Left because it is addressed to the left.

Response to James’ comment – I read your post.  Usually I find what you write well informed and interesting, and that was the case with this post.  Unfortunately, the post sounds to me like an argument for moral relativism.  While I suppose Putin’s invasion of Georgia could be easily construed as an exercise in Realpolitik, that hardly justifies it.  Realpolitik is essentially amoral.

Wrong is wrong.  Allowing Putin to engage in cold blooded and calculated exercise in Realpolitik is wrong.  So long as Putin wants to enforce dictatorship, I don’t give a hoot if what he wants is Realpolitik.  Even when power mad dictators are guided by the “ethics” of Realpolitik, any belief they will behave in a manner we might regard a reasonable is worthless.   Their goal is power.  The influence of such men must be fought and contained.

We must be guided by our ethics, not Putin’s.  Acceding to Putin’s demands means allowing him to stifle any democracy in Russia’s sphere of influence.    After all, would not any such democracy be a natural ally of the United States? 

Consider your definition of luck, Russia falling back and just keeping Abkasia (Sp) in addition to South Ossetia.  If Putin falls back and just keeps Abkasia (Sp) in addition to South Ossetia, it will not be luck.  It will because we choose to resist and make Putin pay for his attempts at conquest.

Response to Sam’s comment – It is apparent you did not like what wrote.  Why is unclear. 

Your comment about about the Indians was uninformed.  Early settlers untentionally wiped out larged numbers of Indians with disease.  The rest they overcame with guns and steel (See Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, a 1997 book by Jared Diamond.).  So the situation is not analogous.

I found your suggestion about calculating Georgia’s and Russia’s annual military spending more interesting so I decided to take your advice.

  • Georgia‘s military spending = ( %GDP x GDP ) / 100% = ( 0.59% x $10.29 billion ) / 100% = 0.061 billion
  • Russia‘s military spending = ( %GDP x GDP ) / 100% = (3.9% x $1286 billion) / 100% = 50.2 billion

Given the relative differences in military spending are much greater than the population differences, I concede the amount spent does contribute to a better understanding of why Georgia is unable to halt Russia’s military advance.  Obviously, Georgia never seriously considered the possibility of throwing its military weight around.  On the other hand, it is obvious that Russia has.

Your suggestions about maps and such is nice, but there are blogs specifically dedicated to strategic-level warfare and detailing the geopolitical consequences.  I am not trying to compete with those blogs.  This a local blog is dedicated to politics, and my suggestion was political.  I want to motivate everyone to write their congressman. 

Although Georgia is a small nation, the consequences of its overthrow by Russian tanks is no small matter.  If the smaller natiions around Russia cannot count upon world support, they must acquire the means to defend themselves.  What means will they seek?  I think the likely solution they will seek is nuclear weapons.

8 thoughts on “ANSWERS FOR COMMENTERS ON THE PREVIOUS POST: WHAT WILL WE DO ABOUT GEORGIA?

  1. CT: Yes, that is Russia being Russia.

    There has never been a time a peace since Cain killed Abel.

    Some countries have had peace for some years – Switzerland and Sweden. That isn’t a commercial for neutrality because they made serious compromises of their integrity to keep from getting dragged into WW II . If the Cold War had gone hot – they would have found how little neutrality means to belligerent Great Powers.

  2. kgotthardt – We are basically back to a strategy of containment. While that is not exactly peace, it is not exactly war either.

    Currently, the USA, because of our wealthy economy and larger population, has a military budget ten times that of Russia. That being the case I doubt Putin wants to fight us any more than we want to fight him. It would appear, however, that he wants to see what he can get away with; he wants to see who he can rob.

    That is what I think James means when he says Russia is being Russia. Traditionally, the only thing that stopped Russia from trying to expand is strong opposition. In fact, that seems to be a trait shared by most xenophobic dictatorships.

  3. I’ve been lurking on this issue for a bit because two questions without answers came to mind when I read Tom’s postings.

    1. Will the U.S. try to engage in military action in Georgia?
    2. Every day it seems there is a new war. We have had “World Wars.” Has there ever been a time of “World Peace” (outside of Pax Romana which was “forced peace” and not exactly proven to be worldwide)?

  4. TC: You are correct that Realpolitik is amoral.

    Russia will respond to a political move (the military is an extension of politics and economics is one aspect of power) not to our ethics. In other words, we may act in ways that seem ethical to us, but what counts is what message the ‘others’ are hearing. The narrative to them.

    I didn’t offer a solution. I’m not suggesting abandoning the Georgians. There are modest actions we can take.

    I’m not morally outraged. I think I understand why Russia is doing what they are doing, why it makes sense to them, and why they will do it in the way they do it.

    I’m not making a case for moral relativism, but for Great Power political relativism. Apply the morals -any morals – to our interventions since Vietnam – current times – and they fall apart.

    We may be about the same age – I’m probably older – so you recall the moral angst over Vietnam. I should post on how I came to terms with that war. I decided that politics determined morality, rather than morality determining politics as everyone was arguing.

    Better said, world view determines morality. Not morality determining world view.

    Considering Russian intent, is there a build up of Russian forces near the Baltic republics? I don’t think so.

Comments are closed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Mark 1:1

The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; (NIV)

Jill Domschot

Joy in the Southwest

clydeherrin

Here are some of the things I have learned from studying the Bible

BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

LIMING'S LINKS

Blatant - Over-Exposure

Insightful Geopolitics

Impartial Informative Always

Libertas and Latte

Ramblings of a Disgruntled Patriot and Coffee Slave

A Blog About Healing From PTSD

Healing After Narcissistic Abuse & Multiple Traumas

Silence of Mind

Where God Speaks and Creation Listens

WTFAI

Wandering Towards Faith Am I

The Stories In Between

Author River Dixon

Eternity

From A Garden To A City - The Prophetic Journey

saania2806.wordpress.com/

Philosophy is all about being curious, asking basic questions. And it can be fun!

Faithful Steward Ministries and FSM Women's Outreach

Christian Outreach Ministry to those Incarcerated, with Addictions and our Military

Jesus Quotes and God Thoughts

“God’s wisdom is something mysterious that goes deep into the interior of his purposes.” ~Apostle Paul

The Lions Den

"Blending the colorful issues of life with the unapologetic truth of scripture, while adding some gracious ferocity.”

cookiecrumbstoliveby

Life through the eyes of "cookie"

Rudy u Martinka

What the world needs now in addition to love is wisdom. We are the masters of our own disasters.

Theo-Logis

Supplying the Light of Love

The Recovering Legalist

Living a Life of Grace

Write Side of the Road

writing my way through motherhood

Freedom Through Empowerment

Taking ownership of your life brings power to make needed changes. True freedom begins with reliance on God to guide this process and provide what you need.

John Branyan

the funny thing about the truth

Victory Girls Blog

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

Conservative Government

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

The Night Wind

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

In Saner Thought

"It is the duty of every man, as far as his ability extends, to detect and expose delusion and error"..Thomas Paine

Always On Watch: Semper Vigilans

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

Dr. Luis C. Almeida

Dr. A's Website

He Hath Said

is the source of all wisdom, and the fountain of all comfort; let it dwell in you richly, as a well of living water, springing up unto everlasting life

quotes and notes and opinions

from a Biblical perspective

partneringwitheagles

WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE OF THESE ENDS (LIFE,LIBERTY,AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS) IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO ALTER OR ABOLISH IT, AND TO INSTITUTE A NEW GOVERNMENT― Thomas Jefferson

nebraskaenergyobserver

The view from the Anglosphere

bluebird of bitterness

The opinions expressed are those of the author. You go get your own opinions.

Pacific Paratrooper

This WordPress.com site is Pacific War era information

THE RIVER WALK

Daily Thoughts and Meditations as we journey together with our Lord.

atimetoshare.me

My Walk, His Way - daily inspiration

Kingdom Pastor

Living Freely In God's Kingdom

%d bloggers like this: