Archive

Archive for the ‘schools’ Category

MATH INVESTIGATIONS: HOW IS IT DOING?

December 10, 2009 1 comment

school.pngSome time back I took an interest in Math Investigations, another new way to teach math to children.  As near as I could tell, this newfangled technique did not have much to recommend it.  Unfortunately, Prince William County Schools had adopted this technique.  So when a group of parents objected with much more force than I could manage, I assumed the role of cheerleader.  These energetic parents eventually got the issue before the School Board and forced a compromise.  The School Board directed our school administrators to adopt a blended approach.  See here.  (Note that at the time I checked the link to the School Boards motion was broken.   Hopefully, that will get fixed.)

So what is the current status of our school’s math program?  The proponents of Math Investigations claim to be data driven.  Do we have any data for the last school year?  I am not sure.  I just know I did not find any on the school’s website.  The PWC Education Reform Blog, however, expresses a more definite opinion. 

The following letter was forwarded to us from one of our contributors. It was sent to Milt Johns, Chairman of the PWC School Board. I have to say that I agree with the sentiments expressed in the letter. It is mid-December and the district still hasn’t presented the elementary school mathematics performance data. As the report summarizing that data isn’t on the agenda for the next board meeting, it’s not likely we’ll see it until January 2010. (continued at When Will the School Board Demand Answers?)

It is December 2009, and we don’t have last year’s performance data?  On an issue that raised all kinds of controversy?  What’s up with that?  If you have kids in the school, you may wish to ask.

Categories: schools

SOMETIMES WE GET MUCH MORE THAN WE PAY FOR

December 6, 2009 Leave a comment

school.pngI once spent a considerable amount of time covering the Prince William County School Board.  After conducting that effort for awhile, I was amazed to find we do not pay the people we put on the School Board.  There is a salary, but it only amounts to $12,000 - $13,000 .  For all practical purposes, we put volunteers in charge of the education of over 70,000 children and a billion-dollar plus budget.  This struck me as insane; I don’t understand the need for such idiotic penny-pinching.  Nonetheless, because some people very much care, this arrangement works better than we have any right to expect.   Mostly out of the goodness of their hearts, our School Board members do an amazing job for us. 

Sometimes the extra work (often 20 hours a week) does become too much.  So it is that Julie Lucas is resigning (see here).  Because of her able service, we all owe her a debt of thanks, our prayers, and our best wishes.

Other Views

The SkepticalObservor noted the story last week,  School Board Member Julie Lucas Resigns.  While James Young has a good opinion of Lucas’ performance on the School Board, he has a lower opinion of some of her supporters.

It is not my wont to link to BLACK VELVET BRUCE LI, but I doubt the wisdom of any rule that allows for no exceptions.  BVBL strongly supported Lucas, and Lucas tacitly accept that support, so this link is relevant.  In Julie Lucas Steps Down  the BVBL raises a valid concern (albeit with the usual character assassinations). 

I suspect the fact that two such often opposed blogs both speak well of Lucas says something positive about her.  It tends to be harder than not to earn the respect of such crusty gentlemen.

What is BVBL’s issue?  Who will replace Lucas?  Because we do not pay School Board members appropriately for the amount of work involved, we can only hope someone honest and competent will volunteer to replace Lucas.  In addition, we must hope voters will recognize honesty and competence when they see it.

Have you ever complained about the public school system?   Do you wonder why we cannot trust politicians?  Then consider how we select our elected officials.  We use a popularity contest.  To compound the problem, we pay most state and local officials relatively little.  So the best folks often cannot afford to run.  Inevitably, those that can afford to run too often have suspicious motives.  How many honest and competent people want to work at a frightfully controversial job for much less than they can rightfully earn?  Yet this sort of nonsense is inevitable with even the best government men can devise.  Because the powers we give over to government are so dangerous, we must always compromise efficient and effective government with government we can control.  That makes putting the government in charge of the delicate task of educating our precious children a dubious endeavor at best.

Categories: schools

BRINGING BACK THE CASE AGAINST MATH INVESTIGATIONS PAGE

October 13, 2009 4 comments

school.pngI can tell the school year has started.  Some of my old posts on Math Investigations are getting a lot of hits.  Since there is interest in the subject, and because this old post is actually more current than not, I decided to bring back The Case Against Math Investigations page.  The extra line at the top kind of creates an eyesore, but I guess I will live with it.

My guess is that this report sparked some interest.

The United States spends markedly more money compared to other developed countries on education. Yet by high school, Americans fall behind many students overseas, in math and science.

In one standardized test taken by approximately a quarter million high school students all over the world, the U.S. lags behind 31 countries in math and 22 countries in science.  (from here)

Categories: schools

WHEN CHANGE IS FOR THE WORST

September 26, 2009 Leave a comment

Here is an email Delegate Scott Lingamfelter sent out warning of a new development in our educational system.

Cult of Personality

Most folks have heard the term “cult of personality” but really do not understand its origin. This concept has it roots in Marxism and was further refined and shaped by Joseph Stalin, the WW II dictator of the Soviet Union. Generally, personality cults are most common in regimes with totalitarian systems of government where a single leader becomes associated with this revolutionary transformation, and comes to be treated as a benevolent “guide” for the nation, without whom the transformation (change, ya’ll) is impossible. Stalin used the cult of personality to build and sustain his power.

Because we are democratic republic, this could not happen in America, right? Well, enter New Jersey’s B. Bernice Young Elementary School where kids in kindergarten are being instructed to sing praises to President Obama with the same adoration school aged kids did for Red China’s Mao during the Cold War. Don’t believe me, here’s the link. See for yourself.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09/24/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5335819.shtml

Now I ask you, what you think the liberal left would be doing if school aged kids has been required to sing such songs of adoration, say, for President George W. Bush? It wouldn’t take much imagination, really, would it?

Here’s the point. President Obama is not responsible for this. But frankly, he should discourage it. This sort of thing is the antithesis of what our founders believed the way leaders should be regarded. Remember, our first president, George Washington, (I name him here because given the state of civics education in America, you can’t be certain some folks know who that was) stepped down after two terms to emphasize the need for elected government, even while others wanted him to continue in power.

As our Declaration of Independence says “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”. We, you and I, are the sovereign, not any elected leaders or legislative body. They are the functionaries of the authority we grant them. No more, no less. So when I see this sort of “cult of personality” crop up, I am offended. But when I see it orchestrated in our classrooms, I am angry! You should be too.

The left has mocked the tea bag movement. Even the President’s top advisor has called these patriotic people (including me and my family) who are concerned about freedom and the future of the country an “angry mob”. Well folks, if this sort of state-sanctioned hero worship doesn’t make the hair stand up on the back of your neck, you better get out the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and take a good read of both.

I don’t expect to hear one word of protest from the left. Why? Because they approve of “iconic worship” while lecturing the rest of us about the “intolerance” of religion. None of that, thank you very much.

So to all the liberals out there, God Bless America, and Lord protect us from cults of personality and the orchestrated songs of adoration that accompany them.

L. Scott Lingamfelter
Delegate, 31st District
Virginia House of Delegates

Categories: schools

WHAT DISTINGUISHES CONSERVATIVE FROM LIBERAL THOUGHT

September 9, 2009 1 comment

Some people have tried to reduce political divisions to different notions about personal and economic autonomy.  For an example, see the chart below.

Others see the issue as a purely moral one.  That is illustrated by the following cartoon.

I fear what distinguishes Conservatives from Liberals is a bit more subtle.  As we grow to maturity, we are suppose to learn how to think logically.  Unfortunately, many of us fail to learn how to think properly.  Instead of learning how to think properly, many learn a sophisticated rationalization (otherwise known as an ideology unfounded in logic and fact).

There is no easy way to learn how to think properly.  Logical thought requires self discipline and starts with well-considered, time tested assumptions.   To a large extent, we inherit both our self discipline and our assumptions from our parents and teachers.  Without good instruction, we are already far behind.

The understanding of what is required for logical thought distinguishes modern Conservatives from modern Liberals.  Conservatives are not geniuses or better people, but they do more often insist upon disciplined logic that begins with time tested assumptions.  Conservatives insist that we will not and cannot arrive at the desired effect unless we execute the appropriate cause.  Liberals, on the other hand, insist their programs will work just because “it is the right thing to do.”

Look at how Liberals deal with a “crisis.”  Don’t they argue that with the Will and the right Leader, we can and will succeed in overcoming the crisis.  What do Liberals do what when their Anointed One does not have this marvelous Will at his command?  Don’t they then try desperately to fix the mess they have made?  Don’t they stubbornly seize powers they have no right to exercise?  Thus, we end up with a “plot” to create a dictatorship that arises from nothing more astounding than prideful ignorance.

Where does Liberalism’s faulty thinking stem from?  We have been taught in an education system which is increasingly socialist in character.  The structure of this system does not marry the effect that parents desire with an appropriate cause.  Socialism empowers politicians, not parents.  Socialism makes politicians and special interests its customers, not parents and their children.

As consumers, when we have a choice, we go to the supplier most able to fulfill our needs.   The prospect of that money in our hands instills discipline in suppliers.  As consumers, we are in control because we have and control our own money.  Paying the bill, the cause, produces the desired effect, the product or service we want.

When we pay taxes, we give responsibility over to politicians to fulfill our needs.  We also give up a huge amount of control.  Our  money is no longer in our hands.   We cannot force suppliers to compete for our dollars.  We can only rail against politicians about an illogically constructed system.

And our school system is atrociously illogical.  Four different levels of government –  Federal, state, county, and a School Board — run our schools.  When we have a problem, who do you blame?   Can they even hear you?  Don’t those same politicians also run all kinds of different enterprises such as Social Security, Medicare, the military, police forces, roads and mass transit, welfare, and so forth?  When you complain about the school system, won’t your complaints be drowned out by untold numbers of complaints about so many other problems?  Even if your school board member hears you, his authority is mightly constrained by Federal, state, and county mandates.  So what is he suppose to do?

Thus, our schools work poorly.  Instead of learning Western history and literature founded upon a sound understanding of reading, writing, and arithmetic, our children learn to rationalize with isms such as socialism, environmentalism, multiculturalism, secularism and so forth.  Thus, we are too often poorly educated, confused and ignorant.  Almost inevitably we tend to elect socialists whose promises sound so good, but whose leadership only worsens an already bad situation.  Continuing to vote for socialists must in the end result in the creation of a Marxist or Communist state.

So what can we do?  We can vote for who want to lead us instead of dominate us.  We can vote for men and women who respect our right to keep and spend the bulk our earnings as we each think appropriate.