<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMERICA&#8217;S ARISTOCRACY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizentom.com/2009/11/22/americas-aristocracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizentom.com/2009/11/22/americas-aristocracy/</link>
	<description>Conservative commentary from Gainesville, Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Tom</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2009/11/22/americas-aristocracy/#comment-16935</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.com/?p=6783#comment-16935</guid>
		<description>Katherine Gotthardt - I don&#039;t accept your description of the people who work for local government, but that is another discussion

What is relevant here is equating losing one&#039;s job with being thrown under the bus.  Our jobs do not belong to us.  That is just a figure of speech.  When we are employed, we are working for pay.  We exchange our labor for a paycheck.  So long as our employer (In the case of government jobs, that is the public.) has the money and sees our services as sufficiently desirable, he will pay us the paycheck we want.  Otherwise, he will not.  In any event, we can always go looking for another position.  

When we quit one job for another, do we consider that throwing our employer under the bus?  No?  Why is that?  Is it because the job does not belong to us, and we don&#039;t belong to our employer?  Would you like to change your status?  Slaves don&#039;t get thrown under the bus -- at least not so long as they are considered valuable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katherine Gotthardt &#8211; I don&#8217;t accept your description of the people who work for local government, but that is another discussion</p>
<p>What is relevant here is equating losing one&#8217;s job with being thrown under the bus.  Our jobs do not belong to us.  That is just a figure of speech.  When we are employed, we are working for pay.  We exchange our labor for a paycheck.  So long as our employer (In the case of government jobs, that is the public.) has the money and sees our services as sufficiently desirable, he will pay us the paycheck we want.  Otherwise, he will not.  In any event, we can always go looking for another position.  </p>
<p>When we quit one job for another, do we consider that throwing our employer under the bus?  No?  Why is that?  Is it because the job does not belong to us, and we don&#8217;t belong to our employer?  Would you like to change your status?  Slaves don&#8217;t get thrown under the bus &#8212; at least not so long as they are considered valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Gotthardt</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2009/11/22/americas-aristocracy/#comment-16934</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Gotthardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.com/?p=6783#comment-16934</guid>
		<description>The few people who work in local government but earn a pittance don&#039;t have unions.  Many are proud to serve their communities but don&#039;t get credit for it.  Then, those same people are put on furlough or are laid off.  That&#039;s what I mean about being thrown under the bus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The few people who work in local government but earn a pittance don&#8217;t have unions.  Many are proud to serve their communities but don&#8217;t get credit for it.  Then, those same people are put on furlough or are laid off.  That&#8217;s what I mean about being thrown under the bus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Tom</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2009/11/22/americas-aristocracy/#comment-16933</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.com/?p=6783#comment-16933</guid>
		<description>Katherine Gotthardt - Government workers get thrown under the bus?  I would like to say let&#039;s not make it us versus them, but that is kind of hard to do.  What I suggest you consider is the fact that government workers, via their unions, compose one of the most highly organized special interest groups.  Moreover, during these hard times, unions have made power quite evident.  For example, did you note where much of the money went from the so-called stimulus package?

That fact is I cannot by myself not make it us versus them.  So long as people strive greedily to fill their pockets with money from our government&#039;s coffers, we have a problem.  That is why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxfreedomday/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tax Freedom Day &lt;/a&gt;is in May, and the deficit is ballooning.  If we keep up this sort of reckless spending, we will wreck the economy.  Then everybody will be thrown under the bus, especially our children.

If our economy were actually &quot;well run,&quot; our government would not be in the business of giving various groups &quot;rights&quot; at the expense of the taxpayers.  Because such &quot;rights&quot; employ too many special interests, they are too costly. 

Because government spending has become such a drag on the economy, we would all be better off if lots of government workers went looking for jobs in the private sector. To pay for the things our government must do, most of us need to work in the private sector.  That is just the way it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katherine Gotthardt &#8211; Government workers get thrown under the bus?  I would like to say let&#8217;s not make it us versus them, but that is kind of hard to do.  What I suggest you consider is the fact that government workers, via their unions, compose one of the most highly organized special interest groups.  Moreover, during these hard times, unions have made power quite evident.  For example, did you note where much of the money went from the so-called stimulus package?</p>
<p>That fact is I cannot by myself not make it us versus them.  So long as people strive greedily to fill their pockets with money from our government&#8217;s coffers, we have a problem.  That is why <a href="http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxfreedomday/" rel="nofollow">Tax Freedom Day </a>is in May, and the deficit is ballooning.  If we keep up this sort of reckless spending, we will wreck the economy.  Then everybody will be thrown under the bus, especially our children.</p>
<p>If our economy were actually &#8220;well run,&#8221; our government would not be in the business of giving various groups &#8220;rights&#8221; at the expense of the taxpayers.  Because such &#8220;rights&#8221; employ too many special interests, they are too costly. </p>
<p>Because government spending has become such a drag on the economy, we would all be better off if lots of government workers went looking for jobs in the private sector. To pay for the things our government must do, most of us need to work in the private sector.  That is just the way it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Gotthardt</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2009/11/22/americas-aristocracy/#comment-16932</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Gotthardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.com/?p=6783#comment-16932</guid>
		<description>Somehow, I always think of government workers as being pretty mid-wage-earning, hard working people.  Unfortunately, these are the people who are thrown under the bus when government is &quot;reduced.&quot;  The people making the real bucks and those who are power mongers get to stay and increase their own salaries and stations in life.  Thus, the middle class gets smaller and smaller, as does the aristocracy which, ironically, becomes increasingly more powerful and wields that power not only through government but industry.  The rest of us are relegated to the peasant class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I always think of government workers as being pretty mid-wage-earning, hard working people.  Unfortunately, these are the people who are thrown under the bus when government is &#8220;reduced.&#8221;  The people making the real bucks and those who are power mongers get to stay and increase their own salaries and stations in life.  Thus, the middle class gets smaller and smaller, as does the aristocracy which, ironically, becomes increasingly more powerful and wields that power not only through government but industry.  The rest of us are relegated to the peasant class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Karaffa</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2009/11/22/americas-aristocracy/#comment-16930</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Karaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.com/?p=6783#comment-16930</guid>
		<description>Good Post.  I agree that the Federal Government should only exist to protect the rights of the people.  The rest is up to us as individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Post.  I agree that the Federal Government should only exist to protect the rights of the people.  The rest is up to us as individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
