Comments on: THE SECOND GILMORE-WARNER DEBATE

By: Citizen Tom

Citizen Tom — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:10:27 +0000

kgotthardt — Thanks for the moral support.

By: kgotthardt

kgotthardt — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:23:41 +0000

WOW, MB, that’s a bit much, isn’t it? I’m not invalidating your feelings, but generally, I find Tom pretty fair. Sure he can irritate you but we can ALL do that to one another.

By: MB

MB — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:09:00 +0000

Tom, I skipped this in my first comment, but – you’re an idiot. I could link you and say “Tom’s a confused pedophile”, and then say “I linked you, people can read it” if you complain about it. You’re dishonest at the most basic levels – really, there is no need to link me for your hackery. You’re free to, of course, but it seems an utter waste of time on both our parts.

By: Citizen Tom

Citizen Tom — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:00:02 +0000

MB – I linked to your post. People can read it.

Actually, given what you had to say about Gilmore, I find your compmisrepresentation ironic. Other than the fact Gilmore referred to the Virginia Supreme Court when he obviously meant the US Supreme Court, Warner and Gilmore pretty much took the same position. Since Gilmore spoke on this matter first, Warner could have observed discrepancy. He obviously thought it too petty to bother with.

By: MB

MB — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:46:14 +0000

Tom, as is his usual habit, completely misrepresents my position. My lamentation was over the willingness of both candidates to toss aside DC’s own process and right to handle the issue to score political points. The end.