Comments on: NO DEBATES? WHY NOT? http://citizentom.com/2008/04/18/no-debates-why-not/ Welcome to Conservative commentary from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway. Tue, 05 Jun 2012 01:28:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: FAMILYFOUNDATIONBLOG.COM » Blog Archive » A Day On The Blogosphere http://citizentom.com/2008/04/18/no-debates-why-not/#comment-13129 Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:16:01 +0000 http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=989#comment-13129 [...] also had one from Citizen Tom. He said one of our posts was “odd.” Considering it was a post mentioning nothing more [...]

]]> By: Citizen Tom http://citizentom.com/2008/04/18/no-debates-why-not/#comment-13119 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:10:08 +0000 http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=989#comment-13119 Steve Rossie — No insult intended.

I did not expect what I found on your post.

Odd – differing in nature from what is ordinary, usual, or expected: an odd choice.

]]> By: Steve Rossie http://citizentom.com/2008/04/18/no-debates-why-not/#comment-13118 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:01:05 +0000 http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=989#comment-13118 Clarification: Sorry, I clicked submit too fast and didn’t clarify that the “odd observations” comment you referred to was from my post on http://www.familyfoundationblog.com/?p=212. On the other hand, I do want to thank you for reading and mentioning us now and in the past.

]]> By: Steve Rossie http://citizentom.com/2008/04/18/no-debates-why-not/#comment-13117 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:48:59 +0000 http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=989#comment-13117 With all due respect, please explain to me what qualifies my post on the Gilmore-Marshall contest as “odd observations”? The post simply cites two sources — The Richmond Times-Dispatch and the Smyth County Conservative — with the former saying Gllmore is ahead and the later saying the controversial big win for Marshall in Tazewell is null and void. Since when is stating facts and citing other sources “odd”? Would love to hear your explanation.

]]> By: Spank That Donkey http://citizentom.com/2008/04/18/no-debates-why-not/#comment-13110 Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:14:06 +0000 http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=989#comment-13110 It would seem that Del. Marshall should challenge LG Bolling and AG McDonnell to a debate on getting Republicans elected state wide.

What was it that Del. Marshall said about those two proven statewide elected’s?

JTB:
I have a sneaking suspicion that you supported Ron Paul? Neo-Con, Old Guard, sycophant, Baathists?

Did Governor Gilmore accidentally back over your pet or something leaving his driveway?

]]>