<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE REPORT:  UPDATE 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizentom.com/2008/04/12/credentials-committee-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizentom.com/2008/04/12/credentials-committee-report/</link>
	<description>Welcome to Conservative commentary from Gainesville, Virginia. That&#039;s OUTSIDE the Beltway.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Tom</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2008/04/12/credentials-committee-report/#comment-13081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Citizen Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-13081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BetterKateThanEver - Near the end of his post, Charles of Two Conservatives deals quite effectively with your &quot;arguments&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://twoconservatives.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-pwc-credentials-committee-was.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BetterKateThanEver &#8211; Near the end of his post, Charles of Two Conservatives deals quite effectively with your &#8220;arguments&#8221; <a href="http://twoconservatives.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-pwc-credentials-committee-was.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BetterKateThanEver</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2008/04/12/credentials-committee-report/#comment-13080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BetterKateThanEver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-13080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gosh, if bvbl is so powerful as to derail your candidate for the 51st, I&#039;m sure it can be used quite effectively against Caddigan (or any other candidate) somewhere in the near future, who chooses to ignore the people&#039;s insistence that the rule of law be enforced. Thanks to bvbl more people are aware, and are watching, what goes on with their elected reps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, if bvbl is so powerful as to derail your candidate for the 51st, I&#8217;m sure it can be used quite effectively against Caddigan (or any other candidate) somewhere in the near future, who chooses to ignore the people&#8217;s insistence that the rule of law be enforced. Thanks to bvbl more people are aware, and are watching, what goes on with their elected reps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Tom</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2008/04/12/credentials-committee-report/#comment-13074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Citizen Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-13074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RoyalWillie - I sympathize with your complaint, and I would be willing to vote Maureen Caddigan out of the party.  Nonetheless, this sort of argument is silly.   Are we trying to do the right thing or be consistent?

Consider this quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson:  &quot;Foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. &quot;  And no,  I don&#039;t mean to suggest you have a small mind.  I want us both to avoid a pitfall.

There is also a difference.  We have every right to be upset with Caddigan because she violated her pledge by supporting another party&#039;s candidate.  But that is about all she did.  She did not engage in an active smear campaign designed to destroy anyone&#039;s reputation.

Caddigan is also an elected official.  Because of the way incumbents have conived the rules, if you look into it,  I think you will find getting rid of Caddigan would be quite difficult.  Such an effort is certainly beyond my small abilities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RoyalWillie &#8211; I sympathize with your complaint, and I would be willing to vote Maureen Caddigan out of the party.  Nonetheless, this sort of argument is silly.   Are we trying to do the right thing or be consistent?</p>
<p>Consider this quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson:  &#8220;Foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. &#8221;  And no,  I don&#8217;t mean to suggest you have a small mind.  I want us both to avoid a pitfall.</p>
<p>There is also a difference.  We have every right to be upset with Caddigan because she violated her pledge by supporting another party&#8217;s candidate.  But that is about all she did.  She did not engage in an active smear campaign designed to destroy anyone&#8217;s reputation.</p>
<p>Caddigan is also an elected official.  Because of the way incumbents have conived the rules, if you look into it,  I think you will find getting rid of Caddigan would be quite difficult.  Such an effort is certainly beyond my small abilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoyalWillie</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2008/04/12/credentials-committee-report/#comment-13072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RoyalWillie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-13072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it seems to me that you have some strong feelings about Greg and his non-support of the Republican candidate, how is this any different from Maureen Caddigan’s active support for Democrats Barg and Pandak against her enemies Frederick and Stewart who happen to be Republican?  Where is the push to remove her?  Is it the principle or the person?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it seems to me that you have some strong feelings about Greg and his non-support of the Republican candidate, how is this any different from Maureen Caddigan’s active support for Democrats Barg and Pandak against her enemies Frederick and Stewart who happen to be Republican?  Where is the push to remove her?  Is it the principle or the person?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Tom</title>
		<link>http://citizentom.com/2008/04/12/credentials-committee-report/#comment-13069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Citizen Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizentom.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-13069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BetterKateThanEver -  The post above deals with the rationale for rejecting Letiecq’s application.  There is no point in repeating it in this comment.  All I can add is that the applicant the committee rejected was at least as much of a Republican as is Letiecq.  

Last fall’s 51st Dist. Delegate convention had the opportunity to choose between two good candidates.  The race between these candidates was hard fought and close.  In such situations, some acrimony is almost inevitable.  Virtually no one goes into politics wanting to lose.  

Letiecq contributed enthusiastically to increasing the hostility between the candidates and to developing dissension within the GOP.  After the convention, Letiecq worked for the failure of the party&#039;s nominee.  Is that the kind of help you want want to give the Republican Party?

Are you sure you do not want to reconsider?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BetterKateThanEver &#8211;  The post above deals with the rationale for rejecting Letiecq’s application.  There is no point in repeating it in this comment.  All I can add is that the applicant the committee rejected was at least as much of a Republican as is Letiecq.  </p>
<p>Last fall’s 51st Dist. Delegate convention had the opportunity to choose between two good candidates.  The race between these candidates was hard fought and close.  In such situations, some acrimony is almost inevitable.  Virtually no one goes into politics wanting to lose.  </p>
<p>Letiecq contributed enthusiastically to increasing the hostility between the candidates and to developing dissension within the GOP.  After the convention, Letiecq worked for the failure of the party&#8217;s nominee.  Is that the kind of help you want want to give the Republican Party?</p>
<p>Are you sure you do not want to reconsider?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

