You certainly aren’t refering to the false accusation at BVBL that Asim “leaked” classified information, are you? BVBL is not a reliable source of information, witness the number of retractions he has to make on easily verifiable facts.

If you simply read the WP article regarding Asim, you will see that, far from claiming he leaked information, Asim is in fact the person who TOLD the FBI that they had given out classified information. it was a different lawyer given the same information that leaked it. Asim tried to help our country hide it’s secrets when our country carelessly released them.

But to the gang, Asim is evil because he represented people who turned out to have “ties” to terrorism.

Like most of what you read, it’s all a shell game. A post on AMC says they told people not to help the FBI. But on the same website you find they were recruiting people to join the FBI who spoke arabic, and they were encouraging people to cooperate. There were muslims who were good patriotic people who saw AMC as a benign organization, and the fact that AMC remained and it’s leaders weren’t all thrown in prison shows that it wasn’t simply a “terrorist” organization.

But I’ve fallen into the trap again, trying to answer charges that aren’t meant to be answered.

Julie Lucas is lucky that the people who defend Faisal are NOT of the mind to throw accusations around to see if something sticks. She thinks she was “attacked” because of a comment about wanting “democrats” to vote for her, while her supporters claim Faisal wants illegals and terrorists to vote for him. Which is the real smear?

That should be “associates.” His continued relationship with Asim Ghafoor has yet to be explained anywhere. My concern lies here, not in the past stuff that gets drudged up.